Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-16 Thread David Kastrup
Nicolas Sceaux writes: > Le 16 nov. 2009 à 20:32, David Kastrup a écrit : > >> With very few exceptions (about 2 or 3, one being the harp-pedal >> code), all the commands appear to use the let-binding mechanism. > > Indeed, when I introduced the property binding thing I changed > consistently all

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-16 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 16 nov. 2009 à 20:32, David Kastrup a écrit : > With very few exceptions (about 2 or 3, one being the harp-pedal code), > all the commands appear to use the let-binding mechanism. Indeed, when I introduced the property binding thing I changed consistently all markup command definitions. But i

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-16 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen writes: > On 11/15/09 11:15 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > >> Carl Sorensen writes: >> >>> The property signature is a documentation-only convention. It has >>> no functionality except for producing documentation. >> >> Thanks, but wrong. Please look in the definition of >> defi

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-16 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/15/09 11:15 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > Carl Sorensen writes: > >> On 11/14/09 1:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at >>> define-builtin-markup-command. >>> >>> Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-comman

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-15 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen writes: > On 11/14/09 1:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > >> >> >> Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at >> define-builtin-markup-command. >> >> Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-command it looks to me >> like you can specify default properties and

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-15 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/14/09 1:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at > define-builtin-markup-command. > > Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-command it looks to me > like you can specify default properties and those are let to the > specifi

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-15 Thread David Kastrup
Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 20:16:51 schrieb Nicolas Sceaux: >> Le 14 nov. 2009 à 09:29, David Kastrup a écrit : >> > Now the harp-pedal command defines the property signature >> > >> > ((size 1.0) >> > (harp-pedal-details) >> > (thickness 0.5)) >> > >> > So fa

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-15 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 20:16:51 schrieb Nicolas Sceaux: > Le 14 nov. 2009 à 09:29, David Kastrup a écrit : > > Now the harp-pedal command defines the property signature > > > > ((size 1.0) > > (harp-pedal-details) > > (thickness 0.5)) > > > > So far, so fine. It > > then calls make-har

Re: A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-15 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 14 nov. 2009 à 09:29, David Kastrup a écrit : > Now the harp-pedal command defines the property signature > > ((size 1.0) > (harp-pedal-details) > (thickness 0.5)) > > So far, so fine. It > then calls make-harp-pedal without passing it those let-bound > variables. As far as I understan

A few questions regarding markup

2009-11-15 Thread David Kastrup
Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at define-builtin-markup-command. Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-command it looks to me like you can specify default properties and those are let to the specified default values (#f if unspecified) or the respective properties