Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> Le 16 nov. 2009 à 20:32, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
>> With very few exceptions (about 2 or 3, one being the harp-pedal
>> code), all the commands appear to use the let-binding mechanism.
>
> Indeed, when I introduced the property binding thing I changed
> consistently all
Le 16 nov. 2009 à 20:32, David Kastrup a écrit :
> With very few exceptions (about 2 or 3, one being the harp-pedal code),
> all the commands appear to use the let-binding mechanism.
Indeed, when I introduced the property binding thing I changed consistently
all markup command definitions. But i
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 11/15/09 11:15 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>>> The property signature is a documentation-only convention. It has
>>> no functionality except for producing documentation.
>>
>> Thanks, but wrong. Please look in the definition of
>> defi
On 11/15/09 11:15 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 11/14/09 1:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at
>>> define-builtin-markup-command.
>>>
>>> Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-comman
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 11/14/09 1:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at
>> define-builtin-markup-command.
>>
>> Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-command it looks to me
>> like you can specify default properties and
On 11/14/09 1:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at
> define-builtin-markup-command.
>
> Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-command it looks to me
> like you can specify default properties and those are let to the
> specifi
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 20:16:51 schrieb Nicolas Sceaux:
>> Le 14 nov. 2009 à 09:29, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> > Now the harp-pedal command defines the property signature
>> >
>> > ((size 1.0)
>> > (harp-pedal-details)
>> > (thickness 0.5))
>> >
>> > So fa
Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 20:16:51 schrieb Nicolas Sceaux:
> Le 14 nov. 2009 à 09:29, David Kastrup a écrit :
> > Now the harp-pedal command defines the property signature
> >
> > ((size 1.0)
> > (harp-pedal-details)
> > (thickness 0.5))
> >
> > So far, so fine. It
> > then calls make-har
Le 14 nov. 2009 à 09:29, David Kastrup a écrit :
> Now the harp-pedal command defines the property signature
>
> ((size 1.0)
> (harp-pedal-details)
> (thickness 0.5))
>
> So far, so fine. It
> then calls make-harp-pedal without passing it those let-bound
> variables. As far as I understan
Ok, I am digging through harp-pedals.scm and looking at
define-builtin-markup-command.
Now from the definition of define-builtin-markup-command it looks to me
like you can specify default properties and those are let to the
specified default values (#f if unspecified) or the respective
properties
Hi, Elie!
Sorry for the late answer!
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Elie Roux wrote:
One of the aim will certaily be to make a standard for gregorian chant
representation, that will be under GPL, and that everyone will be able to
use, a bit like MusicXML is ; I think it is quite important that somethi
Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit :
What is it exactly, that you want to make? Do you want to make a
language for describing gregorian chant, or do you also need to
actually produce notation from that language?
If you need to produce notation, I would focus on that. The language
that you need wil
Elie Roux writes:
> i have a project of 6 months consisting in building a standard for
> gregorian chant notation.
That sounds as a nice project.
> I think i'm going to do it in xml, because it can be a real
> standard.
What is it exactly, that you want to make? Do you want to make a
language
Elie Roux wrote:
But the problem is that, like you say in your site, xml cannot be written by
hand, so we must think of another way of writing. We must also think of a way
of printing it. I have thought that it could be possible to make something
that looks like lilypond, or an extention of it.
Hello,
First I must say I'm impressed by your work, the result is almost perfect, and
the fact that it is under GPL makes it better.
I'm a student of ENST Bretagne (an ingeneer school) in France (that's why my
english is quite bad), and i have a project of 6 months consisting in building a
standa
15 matches
Mail list logo
