On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:22:20PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 16:27, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > What is the proper fix? Should we be using
> > >
> > > using std;
> > >
> > > somewhere?
> >
> > Ye
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 16:27, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> >
> > What is the proper fix? Should we be using
> >
> > using std;
> >
> > somewhere?
>
> Yes, I think a declaration
>
> using namespace std;
>
> would solve the issue. C++ pu
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the changes in 2.5.1 seems to be that all includes of
got changed to . Unfortunately, on MacOS X, this means that all
references to isinf() are no longer found (presumably cmath wraps this
as std::isinf, although
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> One of the changes in 2.5.1 seems to be that all includes of
> got changed to . Unfortunately, on MacOS X, this means that all
> references to isinf() are no longer found (presumably cmath wraps this
> as std::isinf, although I haven't tested that.
What is the prope
One of the changes in 2.5.1 seems to be that all includes of
got changed to . Unfortunately, on MacOS X, this means that all
references to isinf() are no longer found (presumably cmath wraps this
as std::isinf, although I haven't tested that.
Matthias
_
