On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 16:27, Matthias Neeracher wrote: > On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > > > What is the proper fix? Should we be using > > > > using std; > > > > somewhere? > > Yes, I think a declaration > > using namespace std; > > would solve the issue. C++ purists abhor the practice because it > pollutes the program namespace with a potentially large set of symbols. > The stylish solution is > > using std::isinf; > > in every file using this symbol, but this would be a lot of work, and a > pain to write portably until all C++ platforms are up to date with > their namespace usage.
Is it possible to to it the stylish way by putting using std::isinf; in one of the header files that's included in all of the C++ modules? Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
