Hi devs -
Is there more to the double clickable stand-alone then using the
version of LilyPad that works, and putting the LilyPond guts into it?
If not, I'm more then happy to help package it.
Obviously, convert-ly won't work (as noted earlier). But - clicking
PDFs will open the new bundl
leopard with a lot of fink stuff.
MBP:~$ python --version
Python 2.6
MBP:~$ sw_vers
ProductName:Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.5.6
BuildVersion: 9G55
MBP:~$ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.28.6
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Mon Dec 22 11:53:24 2008, 10.5,
i386
On Dec
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:31:34AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 28 d??cembre 2008 ?? 16:23 -0800, Graham Percival a ??crit :
> > You're off the hook until GUB is added to git. :)
> > (no, don't use the current gub/ branch in git; it's out of date.
> > And yes, this is counter-intuiti
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 16:23 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> You're off the hook until GUB is added to git. :)
> (no, don't use the current gub/ branch in git; it's out of date.
> And yes, this is counter-intuitive, but don't talk about that for
> another week or two)
Aren't GUB source
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:03:04AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 28 d??cembre 2008 ?? 15:35 -0800, Graham Percival a ??crit :
> > Remember that "python --version" calls the first version in the
> > PATH. /usr/bin/python (which is what we use instead of the more
> > sensible /usr/bin/e
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 15:35 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Remember that "python --version" calls the first version in the
> PATH. /usr/bin/python (which is what we use instead of the more
> sensible /usr/bin/env python) might be different.
I'm sure it's easy to set
TARGET_PYTHON=/u
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:28:47AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> What does "python --version" says?
Remember that "python --version" calls the first version in the
PATH. /usr/bin/python (which is what we use instead of the more
sensible /usr/bin/env python) might be different.
> IIRC Leopard c
And: Python 2.5 is in this (it was part of LilyPad).
I'll try changing that John to see if I can get the bundle to work.
Josh
On Dec 28, 2008, at 3:28 PM, John Mandereau wrote:
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 17:02 -0600, Neil Tiffin a écrit :
This version referenced here, seemed to mostly wo
Hi Neil... are you on PPC? Or intel?
Best,
Josh
On Dec 28, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
This version referenced here, seemed to mostly work. Except as
follows when trying to convert the initial template from 2.8 to
current (2.12.0).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Ma
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 17:02 -0600, Neil Tiffin a écrit :
> This version referenced here, seemed to mostly work. Except as
> follows when trying to convert the initial template from 2.8 to
> current (2.12.0).
> ImportError: No module named shutil
>
> Is there anything I can do to hel
This version referenced here, seemed to mostly work. Except as
follows when trying to convert the initial template from 2.8 to
current (2.12.0).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Maui-Scr/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-ly",
line 40, in
import lilylib as ly
F
I took the last version of LilyPad that was sent around the list, and
merged it with the intel 2.12... Here is what I get that works on intel:
www.dxarts.washington.edu/~joshp/LilyPond.app.zip
Other things (version numbers, etc.) don't appear correct, but this
does run fine (first run is slo
Indeed, it's running here!
thank you!
Ivo Bouwmans escreveu:
Hallo all,
Josh Parmenter schreef / wrote / skribis:
I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has
directions for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had
been solved? Is this not the case?
The link
Hallo all,
Josh Parmenter schreef / wrote / skribis:
I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has
directions for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had
been solved? Is this not the case?
The link for Leopard on the LilyPond download page points to a page
(iv
I agree and would like to support this too...
josé
Josh Parmenter escreveu:
So why not make the 10.5 package use it? Or is there a way to make it
available? It seems like it would make more sense to point users to
the 10.5 only wrapper then to continue directing them to build / hack
it themsel
So why not make the 10.5 package use it? Or is there a way to make it
available? It seems like it would make more sense to point users to
the 10.5 only wrapper then to continue directing them to build / hack
it themselves... no?
http://lilypond.org/web/install/
If there is a way I could he
Hi Josh,
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Josh Parmenter wrote:
> I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has directions
> for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had been solved? Is
> this not the case?
I think the problem is that the wrapper app *only* works o
I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has
directions for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had
been solved? Is this not the case?
Best,
Josh
**
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
“Every com
18 matches
Mail list logo