Huh, looks like I already created a changes entry and regtests for this
output-attributes feature.
https://codereview.appspot.com/308430043
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4974/
I think I didn't do user documentation because the previous ID-only
functionality didn't have any.
Am 17.05.2018 um 15:46 schrieb David Kastrup:
Paul Morris writes:
On 05/17/2018 09:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Man, I must have slept through this. "this is already supported in
2.19" is misleading if it's actually only supported _outside_ of 2.19,
namely by chancing upon people in the kn
Paul Morris writes:
> On 05/17/2018 09:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Man, I must have slept through this. "this is already supported in
>> 2.19" is misleading if it's actually only supported _outside_ of 2.19,
>> namely by chancing upon people in the know in the mailing lists.
>>
>> The probl
On 05/17/2018 09:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Man, I must have slept through this. "this is already supported in
2.19" is misleading if it's actually only supported _outside_ of 2.19,
namely by chancing upon people in the know in the mailing lists.
The problem with that kind of support is that
Paul Morris writes:
> Hi Urs,
>
> On 05/13/2018 02:02 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> 1) for SVG output the objects would get the class assigned (along
>> with an id). I don't have any idea yet how that is implemented,
>> though. This will make it possible to work with CSS in a display
>> environment.
Hi Paul,
thanks for this information.
This is indeed exactly what I was looking for and will make life easier
for several things.
I think we'll be investigating the options in this year's GSoC project,
maybe that will be helpful thinking about hierarchical stylesheets
another way.
Best
Ur
Hi Urs,
On 05/13/2018 02:02 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
1) for SVG output the objects would get the class assigned (along with
an id). I don't have any idea yet how that is implemented, though.
This will make it possible to work with CSS in a display environment.
You'll be glad to know this is alre
2018-05-14 11:55 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
> I wasn't aware of the fact that you can simply add unknown properties to the
> 'details'.
It's a little so-so.
'details is an established grob-property, and we don't type-check
sub-properties.
But not every grob has 'details per default
Meaning: compilin
Hi Harm,
Am 14.05.2018 um 10:36 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2018-05-14 8:50 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
Am 14.05.2018 um 00:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Hi all,
I'm thinking about having a new grob property \class, but before
digging deeper I'd like to put the idea up for discussion.
2018-05-14 8:50 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 14.05.2018 um 00:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm thinking about having a new grob property \class, but before
>>> digging deeper I'd like to put the idea up for discussion.
>>>
>>> This would have two diffe
Am 14.05.2018 um 00:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Hi all,
I'm thinking about having a new grob property \class, but before
digging deeper I'd like to put the idea up for discussion.
This would have two different goals:
1) for SVG output the objects would get the class assign
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm thinking about having a new grob property \class, but before
> digging deeper I'd like to put the idea up for discussion.
>
> This would have two different goals:
>
> 1) for SVG output the objects would get the class assigned (along with
> an id). I don't have
Hi all,
I'm thinking about having a new grob property \class, but before digging
deeper I'd like to put the idea up for discussion.
This would have two different goals:
1) for SVG output the objects would get the class assigned (along with
an id). I don't have any idea yet how that is implem
13 matches
Mail list logo
