Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 28/12/16 01:06, Alexander Kobel wrote: Essentially, my recent bug report should be enough for a regtest. Cheerio, Miss Sophie! (Sorry, can't help. Not sure if you share our nation's yearly half-an-hour of British humour with "Dinner for One" on the isles - it's Germany's traditional New

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 2016-12-27 21:25, Trevor Daniels wrote: Alexander Kobel wrote Monday, December 26, 2016 1:00 AM Oh well, it's late. I didn't spot measure 7, with the 8( 8) in alto. Same there. And, of course, you should have an extender there in the second verse, and you should have extenders in measure 1 (w

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Alexander Kobel wrote Monday, December 26, 2016 1:00 AM > Oh well, it's late. I didn't spot measure 7, with the 8( 8) in alto. > Same there. > And, of course, you should have an extender there in the second verse, > and you should have extenders in measure 1 (was/was/shall) an measure 9 > (sh

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 2016-12-26 01:01, Alexander Kobel wrote: On 2016-12-26 00:38, Trevor Daniels wrote: I attach a recent example - very Christmassy! Nice one, thanks. Note that, due to the fixed voice association to soprano in the SATB template, you should manually left-align the syllables where the bass has

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 2016-12-26 00:38, Trevor Daniels wrote: Alexander Kobel wrote Sunday, December 25, 2016 2:19 PM But: I cannot imagine a situation where I would not use automatic extenders, so I'm a really bad person to judge the need and requirements for a manual mode. One obvious and fairly common situat

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Alexander Kobel wrote Sunday, December 25, 2016 2:19 PM > But: I cannot imagine a situation where I would not use automatic > extenders, so I'm a really bad person to judge the need and requirements > for a manual mode. One obvious and fairly common situation is when there are several verses s

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Am 25.12.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Noeck: As extender events are generated automatically now it probably is a good idea to tell yacc / bison to recognize but ignore "__" tokens. I don't know at which level the __, \overrides and the automatic extenders interact. But would it make sense to use __ now

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Hi all. On 2016-12-25 13:14, Noeck wrote: As extender events are generated automatically now it probably is a good idea to tell yacc / bison to recognize but ignore "__" tokens. I don't know at which level the __, \overrides and the automatic extenders interact. But would it make sense to use

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

> As extender events are generated automatically now it probably is a > good idea to tell yacc / bison to recognize but ignore "__" tokens. I don't know at which level the __, \overrides and the automatic extenders interact. But would it make sense to use __ now, to force an extender e.g. on a si

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Hi Alexander et al.! As extender events are generated automatically now it probably is a good idea to tell yacc / bison to recognize but ignore "__" tokens. cu, Knut >From 768bf54ad8563b0cb6c2cbce692385656db3a535 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Knut Petersen Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:09:40 +010

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Dear all, I just uploaded Knut's patch (with minor reformatting, to obey the 80-char-per-line limit) to Rietveld; see https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043 The corresponding issue can be found at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5018/ I missed the warnings hidden by the

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 23.12.2016 22:36, Alexander Kobel wrote: The corresponding issue can be found at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5018/ …which I took the liberty to merge with . Thanks for the work and happy holidays as well! Best, Sim

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Dear all, I just uploaded Knut's patch (with minor reformatting, to obey the 80-char-per-line limit) to Rietveld; see https://codereview.appspot.com/313240043 The corresponding issue can be found at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5018/ Thanks again Knut for this great cont