On 12/13/08 8:04 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
> wrote:
>
>> - -) What's the best way to convert an angle/length pair of polar coordinates
>>(angle given in degree) to cartesian coordinates in scheme / guile? I
>>don't want it as
On 12/13/08 6:48 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
I can't help on three of them, but I can help on one
>
> However, I'm running into some problems:
> - -) How can I obtain the line-thickness. It's not a property of the stem grob
> a
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
>> I've been watching this thread, and successive Lilypond versions, to see
>> what's happening about the straight flags that I offered to sponsor in the
>> first post of the thread.
>
> There is some code already existing (but commented
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 13. Dezember 2008 12:03:21 schrieb madhg:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > ...
> > Attached is a patch to implement straight flags (in modern style, i.e.
> > slanted
> > only ~20 degrees). I think the angles (different angles for up/down
> >
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>
> ...
> Attached is a patch to implement straight flags (in modern style, i.e.
> slanted
> only ~20 degrees). I think the angles (different angles for up/down
> stems!)
> and the lengths are okay, although they might still be fine-tuned a bit
> more.
> ...
>
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Neil Puttock:
> I hope you don't mind, but I've taken the liberty of tweaking the
> regression test so it's on three identical systems.
Ah, thanks. I didn't check the collated-files.html, but simply ran the .ly
fil
Hi Reinhold,
I hope you don't mind, but I've taken the liberty of tweaking the
regression test so it's on three identical systems.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-deve
Looks good to me.
+ (flag ,procedure? "A function returning the full flag stencil for
this should be ,stencil? - as you can see, there are plenty of
properties that have procedure values, but aren't defined as such.
+;; Add the stroke to the flag: Load the correct glyph from the font and add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 23. August 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
> > So, to summarize what you suggest:
> > - -) Stem 'flag property: Always a scheme function returning the complete
> > stencil; The default sc
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Below is my patch of feta-banier.mf.
>>
>> While I don't strictly oppose to adding new glyphs, I am wondering
>> why you are creating them. It would be more flexible to have a new
>> function to do this, since you can
> > Below is my patch of feta-banier.mf.
>
> While I don't strictly oppose to adding new glyphs, I am wondering
> why you are creating them. It would be more flexible to have a new
> function to do this, since you can vary thickness and slant
> dynamically.
I don't oppose. However, I can progra
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Attached is a patch to implement straight flags (in modern style,
>> i.e. slanted only ~20 degrees). I think the angles (different angles
>> for up/down stems!) and the lengths are okay, although they might
>> still be
> The other thing that's bothering me with my patch (not your changes)
> is that in the function create_straight_flag_char I need both
> straight_upflag_length and straight_upflag_length#. I haven't found
> a way to pass just one of them and still be able to use the
> hashed/unhashed variable in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Werner,
Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2008 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > Attached is a patch to implement straight flags (in modern style,
> > i.e. slanted only ~20 degrees). I think the angles (different angles
> > for up/down stems!) and the lengths are ok
> Attached is a patch to implement straight flags (in modern style,
> i.e. slanted only ~20 degrees). I think the angles (different angles
> for up/down stems!) and the lengths are okay, although they might
> still be fine-tuned a bit more.
Below is my patch of feta-banier.mf.
> However, I didn
15 matches
Mail list logo
