Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:32:16PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
>> I think this is a fairly uncontroversial addition (it's just stating in
>> each file what's already true) so I'm submitting these patches now
>> rather than later.
>
> For the benefit of the mailist archiv
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:32:16PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> I think this is a fairly uncontroversial addition (it's just stating in
> each file what's already true) so I'm submitting these patches now
> rather than later.
For the benefit of the mailist archives, this *is* controversial,
but
These patches add licensing notices (GFDL1.1+) but _not_ copyright
notices to individual files making up the Notation Reference and
Learning Manual. There's also another dual-licensing my section on
contemporary music (my sole copyright) with GPL2+.
I think this is a fairly uncontroversial additi
