Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:32:16PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: >> I think this is a fairly uncontroversial addition (it's just stating in >> each file what's already true) so I'm submitting these patches now >> rather than later. > > For the benefit of the mailist archives, this *is* controversial, > but the discussion is occuring in other threads.
Uncontroversial inasmuch as it doesn't propose to change the licensing situation, just states the license on a file-by-file basis. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
