On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:48:15PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I applied this patch. I actually had to redo it, because I changed
> define-grobs.scm first, so the patch wouldn't apply. But it's
> applied now, along with the changes to lily/beam.cc and
> scm/define-grob-interfac
Patrick,
I applied this patch. I actually had to redo it, because I changed
define-grobs.scm first, so the patch wouldn't apply. But it's applied now,
along with the changes to lily/beam.cc and scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm so
that details works as desired for beams.
Thanks for your help in ge
On 4/6/09 12:44 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:46:41AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>> So the new assignment, then, is to modify the *.cc file for each
>> object that has a details property so that the elements of the
>> details are included. I haven't rev
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:46:41AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/6/09 7:10 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
> >
> > What do you mean? The way it's done for the Stem related
> > subproperties is that the documentation is included together with
> > the other stem-interface documentation at the
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
The way it's done for the Stem related subproperties
is that the documentation is included together with the other
stem-interface documentation at the end of the file lily/stem.cc. ...
Ahh -OK. I had missed the description at the top, and had just noticed that
On 4/6/09 7:10 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
>>> Thanks Mats, I did not think of doing that.
>>>
>>> This will be a task in itself. For example, Tie has 26 different
>>> subproperties of 'details to document!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This documentation *has* to be automatically generated.
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 4/6/09 3:48 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
So, is the patch okay as it is?
Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in
deta
On 4/6/09 3:48 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>> So, is the patch okay as it is?
>>>
>> Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in
>> details. These are (or at
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> So, is the patch okay as it is?
>>
> Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in
> details. These are (or at least should be) described in the
> corresponding *-inter
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:53:43PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Unfortunately, there are different 'details lists for different grobs,
so there's n
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>
> >>> Unfortunately, there are different 'details lists for
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:53:43PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >> Unfortunately, there are different 'details lists for different grobs,
> >> so there's no
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> This patch moves the 'details property from the internal to the user
>> grob property list.
>
> I believe that moving 'details from internal to user won't have the effect
> we want. I believe that internal properties are set by the grob,
2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
>
>
>
> On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, there are different 'details lists for different grobs,
>>> so there's not a generic set of defaults that we can list, if I und
On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>>
>> Unfortunately, there are different 'details lists for different grobs,
>> so there's not a generic set of defaults that we can list, if I understand
>> correctly.
>
> If 'detail
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/2/09 5:31 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch moves the 'details property from the internal to the user
>> grob property list.
>
> I believe that moving 'details from internal to user won't have the effect
> w
On 4/2/09 5:31 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch moves the 'details property from the internal to the user
> grob property list.
I believe that moving 'details from internal to user won't have the effect
we want. I believe that internal properties are set by the grob, rat
2009/4/3 Patrick McCarty :
> Can someone apply?
I feel uncomfortable while ignoring these kind of messages just
because I could apply it as I have git access, but I am not a
developer but a translator.
If it is really of any help, I could apply it after a LGTM from a
developer. If not, I could si
rick
>From 27dca7f299aac2f0894c05dc7adcb1647b685d1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:01:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: IR: Move 'details to user grob property list
Signed-off-by: Patrick McCarty
---
scm/define-grob-properties.scm | 15 +++---
19 matches
Mail list logo
