Hi,
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2010, at 11:50, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> >I repeat: there is no way that our use of Stockhausen would qualify as
> >"fair dealing" under Canadian copyright law. I cannot speak to
> >copyright law in Germany, Sweden, or other jurisdictio
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
[do not know who said that, Bertalan removed that information]
> > I think you don't understand what top posting means: It means that you
> > quote the whole message (and all messages that it quoted) and simply
> > add your reply a
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> It would make life a bit easier for testers who are directly compiling
> from git if the SHA1 number (perhaps the first eight digits only) could
> be shown in the output of
>
> lilypond --version
>
> Any chance to add this?
The common way is
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I used "git rebase -i" to combine several commits into
> one for the first time recently. This was in ubuntu.
> It threw me for a while because the first editor it
> brought up was nano (to edit the list of commits) and
> then vi (to edit the commi
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>> I'm talking about developer tools. For example, some months ago I
> >>> got the advice to use "grep" to browse LilyPond source code.
> >>
> >> BTW, have you found something better?
> >>
> > Eclipse is quite good at finding macro definitions etc
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Michael Käppler wrote:
> Let's assume I've checked out a fresh master/origin and did some commits
> on top of it. How can I concatenate this commits in one to create only
> one patch?
The easiest way I can think of: if your latest, say, 5 commits should be
squashed int
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/12 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > Fixed and pushed.
>
> Yep, verified. Many thanks once again! I think this can be very useful
> for new contributors.
I hope so.
Maybe you tell me the most common operati
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> > Does that mean shallow clones are inadvisable on Windows?
>
> I'll let Johannes confirm, but I think that shallow clones should be
> fine on Windows now. I got the sense that he "killed the beast" last
> night. It was
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I actually had to change the --work-tree things, since it is utter
> > garbage. I _know_ why I was opposed to its inclusion.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > I added tw
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> > I pushed a new version to git://repo.or.cz/lilypond/dscho.git. You
> > can download it directly here:
> >
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/dscho.git?a=blob_plain;f=lilycontrib.tcl;hb=lilycontrib
>
> Cool, works like a charm now. Thanks a lo
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin <
> > johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > So it doesn'
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin <
> johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So it doesn't give an error, just a warning. But AFAIR I have seen
> > > this warning
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Maximilian Albert <
> maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > P.S.: It would be nice to let the script print a short message when
> > it's finished so that the user know when to stop waiting. ;-)
>
> I had t
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:25 AM
> >
> > I'm git-weary but still alive. Johannes spent *hours* debugging
> > my problem, and eventually traced it to an undiscovered bug
> > in gitk that only affects Microsoft Windows...
>
> N
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > It actually worked here, twice.
> >
> > But you have this wonderful output field in the GUI, what does it have to
> > say? I imagine that it gave you some error message or som
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > It actually only gives you a "Clone/Update" button that makes sure
> > that a local clone (hardcoded to $HOME/lilypond) is up-to-date, but at
> > least it has a pr
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> > >
> > > > We've lo
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > > We've lost 50% of potential contributors to the website because of
> > > git.
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 08:45:22AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> >
> > Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 10, 2009 12:48 AM
> >> I maoing hate git.
> >
> > Git is fine; the complexity comes from the
> > baroque structures in LilyPond. Let's be
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:50AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > A few people talked about browsing the history, which surprised me.
> > Whenever I want to look at history, I use the web git interface. But
> > evidently other people do
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/26/09 11:35 AM, "Johannes Schindelin"
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >
> >> As you're aware, I've been working on a patch for autobeaming.
> >
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> As you're aware, I've been working on a patch for autobeaming.
>
> It affects c++, scheme, and documentation files.
>
> Now I want to apply the patch to master. But the problem is that all of
> the documentation files have moved to Documentation
Hi,
as every year, there is a user's survey about Git; Hopefully as every
year, useful and fascinating ideas will crop up!
Ciao,
Johannes
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:22:32 +0200
From: Jakub Narebski
To: g...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Git User's Su
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:49:12AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Thanks for adding the info about .git/config
> > [push]
> > default = matching
> >
> > to the CG, Patrick! Bloody git developers and their bloody
> > inconsistent commands
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <20090614225255.ga7...@nagi>, Graham Percival
> writes
> >2) I don't know what the current favorite fancy IDE is, although
> >I'm fairly certain that Eclipse runs on Linux. I'm not certain if
> >that would actually be good for Li
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> > >
> > > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
> >
> > And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> > cut t
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> >
> > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
>
> And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> cut the network transfer by more than half
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:10 PM
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > > When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings.
> > >
> > > Trevor, could
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, John Mandereau wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
> > According to
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828
> > a push is precisely what we should do -- since git is a
> > decentralized source control system, that will upload all the
> > missing history.
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > I think you could replace the "input" with "true" in you
> > /etc/gitconfig's autocrlf setting in the [core] section. This should
> > take care of the
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> When I make my own patches, they're Unix line endings.
>
> Trevor, could you do a quick search for the fixes you've pushed, and
> identify the patches that caused the problem?
You can let Git search for you:
$ git log -S"$(printf "\r"
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> When I installed git, I selected Unix style line endings.
> Now every time I or even
> I get this warning for *each* modified file:
>
> warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in .
Please do not top-post. At least remove the stuff you are not reply
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:53 AM
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> >
> > > Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:05 AM
> > >
> > &
Hi,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:05 AM
>
> > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> >
> > > 1.5.2 Installing git
> > >
> > > 0) Full installer or portable application?
>
Hi,
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> 1.5.2 Installing git
>
> 0) Full installer or portable application?
This is my fault; PortableGit is a recent addition. I'd recommend the
installer (but not the "full" installer available from
msysgit.googlecode.com).
> 1) Describe Windows Ex
Hi,
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:33:51PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > On 5/24/09 8:40 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think the instructions in the CG just aren't clear enough. Is
> > > anyone out there happily making git patch
Hi,
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > And how do I exit the EDIT_COMMITMSG window? I've included an image
> > showing the window. If I click on the X button, the whole git bash
> > shell closes along with it. That can't be right.
It's starting vi.
> Okay, this one I figured out. It
Hi,
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Do I have to compile it from source and how do I do that in Windows?
Last time I checked, you could not compile LilyPond on Windows. I tried
hard, with MSys/MinGW, but could not get it to compile due to the vast
number of dependencies.
However,
Hi Aaron,
by sending a private exchange you proved something. You still have not
earned respect with this person.
I would have appreciated a lot of things, such as actually addressing the
original poster's (maybe poorly formulated) concern.
I would have appreciated something which benefits me
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
> >People like you seem to confuse the concept of "polite" with "servant".
>
> Ah yes, people like me. People who confuse concepts. People who are not
> as brilliant as yourself.
Aaron, it would be good to earn some respect here, presumably by
Hi,
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
> On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> >Dewdman,
> >It might help to read this:
> >http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
>
> Very interesting link! It might as well be called "In Defense of Being a
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I think their concern that Scheme is needed to do anything useful is
> > unfounded, and that Scheme just should be disabled for the purpose of
> > the MediaWiki extensi
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>
> > I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is
> > it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
> - the LilyPond plugin for medi
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/3/18 Graham Percival :
>
> > 2) I might organize European vacations around other lilypond
> >contributors, starting with a weekend in Paris. (not because I
> >particularly want to see Paris -- I spent four days there about 10
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 20 mars 09 à 00:38, John Mandereau a écrit :
> >
> > >2) I might organize European vacations around other lilypond
> > > contributors, starting with a weekend in Paris. (not because I
> > > particularly want to see Paris -- I spent four d
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> as always, patches will be thoughtfully considered.
> >
> > It appears a bit disingenuous to me to answer "I can't figure out what
> > does what and why" with "congratulations, then it is your task to
> > figure this out to a degree where yo
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try
> > building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without
> > reverting to their secret knowledge.
>
> Is it really necessary to get nasty?
Like I said in another
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, John Mandereau wrote:
> > It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try
> > building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without
> > reverting to their secret knowledge.
>
> I spent a lot of time testing compilation and installation of In
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Oriolus wrote:
> My malware scanner Norman discovered a trojan after installation of LilyPond:
> Location: C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\guile.exe
> Trojan: W32/Smalldrp.ARAH
Are you sure? These files are cross-compiled from Linux, so there is
litt
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > No need to reclone. Just rename the current branch:
> >
> > $ git branch -m old.branch
> >
>
> This part seemed to work fine.
>
> > And then start anew (in the s
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> > More seriously, the patch doesn't apply here because
> > your line numbering seems to be 1 off from the line
> > numbers I have in git-starting.itexi. I have no idea
> > why that should be. I believe my git repo is ful
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > > I realized after I sent it, though, that I sent it from my Thunderbird
> > > email client and thi
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I realized after I sent it, though, that I sent it from my Thunderbird
> email client and this historically has jacked up the line endings.
We had a very "interesting" discussion with one of the Thunderbirds on the
Git list (who I dragged into th
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Again, Johannes, many thanks for your patience in explaining this to a
> non-developer. :)
You are very welcome!
Thank you for your contributions,
Dscho
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > > Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch
> > > by comparing my local (changed) file with the cor
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:57:39PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> > > Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch b
Hi.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that [git format-patch] creates the patch by
> comparing my local (changed) file with the corresponding file in the
> remote git repository?
No, it creates patches from commits. So you use Git as usual:
(inspec
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:53:06PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > > 1. git-clone gets the entire repo, not just the particular
> > > branch that you want.
> >
> > Indeed, but as Git is pretty
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > 3. I'm not certain if git-clone sets up everything for doing
> > "git pull origin" and "git push origin".
>
> Yes, it does set things up properly. I first acquired the repo using
> the git-clone command and now I gr
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:36:24PM -0700, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> > In the instructions for getting the source code, why not just use
> > git-clone? Is there a difference? The currently suggested method of
> > remote-add + checkout produces a bun
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Tim Slattery wrote:
> Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> >Hmm... You do have a point. I tend to assume anybody familiar enough
> >with LilyPond knows what a tgz archive means,
>
> I'm reasonable familiar with Lilypond at this point, but I had to
> google tgz to find out wha
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > How about
> >
> >$ git archive --prefix=opera_libre/ --format=zip HEAD:
> >
> > ?
>
> It would be just great if repo.or.cz offered this option out-of-th
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > How about
> >
> >$ git archive --prefix=opera_libre/ --format=zip HEAD:
> >
> > ?
>
> It would be just great if repo.or.cz offered this option out-of-the
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> $ zip opera_libre.zip `find opera_libre/ |grep -v '.git'
>
> 2009/2/5 Valentin Villenave :
> > Hmm... You do have a point. I tend to assume anybody familiar enough
> > with LilyPond knows what a tgz archive means, but I could find a way
> > to do a
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> - How could differently-written names for a given author to be joined on
> one?
I guess you could write a .mailmap:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-shortlog.html
(section "FILES").
Ciao,
Dscho
__
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >
> > Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
> >
> > My understanding is that
> >
> > a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
> can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
> [...]
Thanks you for bringing it to the proper place. I've been meaning to, but
got too swamped in work.
It did not exactly help my
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Paul Scott wrote:
> dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009, Trevor Daniels said:
> >
> > > The names are case-insensitive, and they cannot be used as directory
> > > names or the first part of a filename (the bit before the dot).
> >
> > please not
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Shouldn't we start collecting possible project ideas (not only for SoC,
> but for any possible newcomer to LilyPond, so that we don't have to
> point them to the bug tracker telling him/her to simply choose a bug and
> work on that, which ca
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > - just mentioning their wishes, as others have done, is likely to be a
> > waste of time, not to mention an annoyance to the others, as _there
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 02:46:22 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > - the mentor is also expected to work almost full time at least in the
> > beginning,
>
> Sorry, but from my experience with mentoring KDE projects,
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> That said, SoC doesn't recognize the importance of documentation,
Not true. For example, Drupal had a SoC project that was
documentation-only, and I imagine other projects had as well.
> A full list of possible projects is on the google issue
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Other pie-in-the sky: completely redo the part-combiner, using the
> music streams infrastructure.
That would be nice.
> (unfortunately, no I don't have time to mentor.)
But that probably means a no-go for any Lilypond project.
Ciao,
Dscho
P
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Anne Ghisla wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:58:25 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > > > On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nien
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 1/14/09 8:51 AM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> >>> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
> >>
> &g
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Joe Neeman wrote:
> I'd suggest you start by joining the Frogs [1].
Is somebody actually doing the work of applying for GSoC? AFAIK you have
to be accepted as an organization, and you have to apply for that.
Ciao,
Dscho
_
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Valentin Villenave wrote Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:30 PM
>
> > By the way, one sensible addition to the CG might be to invite Windows
> > users to do
> >
> > git config global.autocrlf = false
> >
> > or something like that (by default under Wi
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/1/11 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > The next Windows Git installer will let the user choose which strategy
> > to take.
>
> Great! You have no idea how much hair I have been pulling out about this
> :-)
A
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Graham Percival :
>
> > CG! CG! CG! :)
>
> By the way, one sensible addition to the CG might be to invite Windows
> users to do
>
> git config global.autocrlf = false
>
> or something like that (by default under Windows, git conv
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Stefan Waler wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 12:31 PM
>
> > I'm just wondering what the actual requirements are for running
> > lilypond with mingw on windows platforms. Is there any list for that?
>
> AFAIK no one has seriously tried to compile
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> By the way, I had kept in mind that cross-compiling Python was not
> possible, but it seems that someone we know is trying hard to make it
> happen: http://bugs.python.org/issue1597850
Probably you kept the memory of my failed attempts at bu
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2008, at 22:28, wrote:
>
> > >Right. So the best one can hope for is a series of keyboard maps that
> > >perhaps unify groups of characters, that those that so like may use.
> >
> >The issue is to create a UTF-8 text file with linguistic co
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > Why is Dutch the default language for note-entry? English uses the
> > fewest keystrokes. For comparison, here's a measure from Chopin's
> > Fantasie-impromptu:
>
> because we are Dutch
Hi,
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Chris Sawer wrote:
> On Mac OS X 10.4.11 x86 double-clicking on the app does nothing.
> Launching the binary from the command line directly gives:
>
> ~ $ ./Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/MacOS/LilyPond
> Bus error
Just a guess: if you want to compile something on 10.5 w
Hi Josh,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Josh Parmenter wrote:
> I am on Leopard as well, 10.5.5, intel.
>
> Th GUI won't work... Han-Wen was asking about the binary inside.. You
> need to run it from the command line.
That is why I added this in my original reply:
> >Running lilypond from the command l
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Josh Parmenter wrote:
> I get a crash with the following crashdump running from the command
> line. Hope that helps.
I do not get a crash. Maybe it is because I have a Leopard (10.5)
machine...
However, opening LilyPond, I get a non-working menu. It is just empty.
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Till Rettig wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> > You mean "git reset --hard"? That resets _all_ files. _And_ the
> > staging area.
>
> Guess I meant that one -- I had sometimes problems with wrong commits
> that I didn't g
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, till Rettig wrote:
> > - -) "git checkout filename" -- discards all non-committed changes to the
> > file.
>
> I thought that works only if you remove the file before?
No, it works also with dirty files, i.e. files that have been modified,
but not committed.
The only
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/31/08 5:21 AM, "Johannes Schindelin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to show a diff, but I'm not sure exactly how to
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I'd like to show a diff, but I'm not sure exactly how to get it.
>
> I have done the development work in a fretboards branch on my local machine.
> I have a current git repository in a master branch on my local machine.
> I have a remote reposit
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Graham Percival wrote:
> A month or two ago, there was some discussion about changing the way git
> is managed, to allow doc writers to have permission to change
> Documentation/user/ but not other parts of the tree. At the time I
> begged everybody to shelve the disc
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, John Mandereau wrote:
> On 2008/07/18 08:48 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Also, it would be nice if some of these perverse hackers could just
> > add an autoconf check for said program.
>
> I added a check for t1asm, but I didn't add a check for a particular
> ver
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Also, it would be nice if some of these perverse hackers could just add
> an autoconf check for said program.
Heh, I am a bit short on time. But sure, I'll try to come up with a patch
this afternoon.
BTW installing LilyPond with "checkinstal
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > FWIW I also like the idea of having less dependencies, but not at the
> > price of being unable to hack the source. Even if that is the source
> > to a font.
>
> Well, adding pre-compiled fonts to the tarball just remove a dependency.
> As
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > >> I can only repeat that IMHO it would be best to distribute the final
> > >> fonts to reduce the dependencies.
> > >
> > > Let's do this if there is no objection.
> >
> > I oppose to this idea.
>
> Why?
FWIW I also like the idea of having les
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, madhg wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > That was totally unnecessary, especially given the fact that just a
> > _small_ web search would have turned up a _few_ GUIs.
> >
> > Don't waste my time,
> > Dscho
> >
&g
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Maybe it is not intended exactly to "compose" in the first place, but if
> you are a composer and want to show your scores neat enough as to amaze
> others, give LilyPond a try.
To enhance on that: if you are a musician familiar with computers f
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Tom Richard wrote:
> Hard core reality check folks. Either do it right or not at all.
That was totally unnecessary, especially given the fact that just a
_small_ web search would have turned up a _few_ GUIs.
Don't waste my time,
Dscho
___
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I'm now able to push changes to the repository, but every time I do a
> push, I get two commits -- one for the changes I made, and one for a
> merge.
Funny. For another project I am working on, I wrote an introduction for
exactly this, a coup
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin skrev:
> > FWIW the proper way to undo a merge is to
> >
> > $ git rebase --onto MERGE_HEAD^ MERGE_HEAD
> >
> > where MERGE_HEAD has to be substituted by the merge commit that you
> > w
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
