Hi, On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > >> I can only repeat that IMHO it would be best to distribute the final > > >> fonts to reduce the dependencies. > > > > > > Let's do this if there is no objection. > > > > I oppose to this idea. > > Why? FWIW I also like the idea of having less dependencies, but not at the price of being unable to hack the source. Even if that is the source to a font. Oh, and when I installed Lily yesterday, metapost was not correctly checked for. > > I would rather completely stop distributing tarballs. Git clone is a > > more efficient way of distributing source code. > > Nice idea. Heh. We have the whole _binary_ setup to build msysGit in a Git repository, with git.git as a submodule. However, I recommend against having the generated fonts as a submodule in LilyPond; rather make an independent branch (a la 'html' in git.git). Ciao, Dscho _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
