> All the tests show normal results. Is your Lilypond still built
> with without-kpathsea or did you clean and rebuild the full
> installation?
it was a clean rebuild using kpathsea.
> Try to add the flag -V to ly2dvi and see if it
> provides us any more hints on what goes wrong.
nothing jumped
> Did you remember to run 'texhash' after the installation?
i didn't remember because i didn't read anywhere that i had to run
this. :) but, i just ran texhash and reran "ly2dvi -p" and i get the
same bad pdf.
> What do the folllowing commands return?
>
> kpsewhich --format='dvips config' lily
> I definitely recommend 1., building Lilypond without kpathsea is
> asking for problems.
well, i did that, and now my pdf output is completely mangled.
i installed tetex-devel which has kpathsea. (i had to force install
this rpm because my tetex installation was in a weird place that rpm
didn't
> You have to build or download the Type1 version of the fonts,
> since that's what ly2dvi -p uses avoid the fuzzy looking
> bitmapped fonts in the PDF files.
>
> Read
> http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/lilypond-user/2002-October/003014.html
> for instructions on how to build and install the fonts
> Did you compile and install Lilypond yourself or did you
> install from an RPM, .dpkg or ...?
i compiled and installed lilypond myself.
> What Linux distribution do you use?
SuSE 8.0
> Do you get the correct fonts if you call ly2dvi with the flags -p or
> -P?
well, what i did originally do
> What you are looking for is
>
> \modernVoiceAccidentals
wow! i should have known that something so basic has already been
done in lily. this program is so expansive that although i've used it
for a couple years, i continually discover new things.
> -Rune
thanks,
david
___
I need to typeset music with multiple voices per staff. Think 4-part
counterpoint (chorales, fugues, etc.) I'd like the following
accidental behavior:
- Lily should consider voices on the same staff separate when adding
accidentals (or naturals). That is, if one needs an accidental on a
par
On 1.6.6 on my Linux box, if i simply look at postscript or pdf output
from Lilypond i don't get noteheads and lots of other symbols. I need
to first run xdvi on the .dvi output, then the fonts are created.
Once created, I'm set and don't need to run xdvi again; unless of
course I try a different
I start off my ly files with:
\paper { papersize = "letter" }
\include "paper16.ly"
This would get me a font size that looked right to me. (It gave me
something pretty identical to Dover editions of Bach.)
To my profound irritation, printing scores on my new iMac makes things
slightly s
> The interface to set the vertical position for multimeasure
> rests is a bit more awkward, try
> \once \property Voice.MultiMeasureRest \override #'staff-position = #3
that works. thanks.
but that notation looks very similar to what we had to do with normal
rests before \rest was introduced.
Hi. I know this isn't the right place to post this question, but I
contacted the maintainer of lilypond for Fink and he basically knows
about this problem and doesn't have time to fix it...
I'm using Fink on Mac OS X to run lilypond. Everything works great
except that everytime I run ly2dvi, lil
hi. i need to place rests in particular vertical locations to avoid
collisions. something like a4\rest works great for non-whole measure
rests. but i'd like an equivalent for a whole measure rest that is
centered within a measure.
also, just a comment on a previous post: someone mentioned that
hi everyone. i'm forwarding along some info i read on another mailing
list that i thought would be of interest to lily developers and users:
An article by Don Byrd at
http://php.indiana.edu/~donbyrd/CMNExtremes.htm has many examples of
extremes in common practice music notation. e.g.:
* Highes
13 matches
Mail list logo
