I can see duration vs. moment becoming a source of confusion, since these
are not the same type. I would expect a property named baseDuration to take
a value of type ly:duration?.
That is starting to open a can of worms, though, because the usage of
duration vs. moment is inconsistent in the codeb
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 5:33 PM Dan Eble wrote:
> On 2024-10-03 07:38, Joram Noeck wrote:
> > You guys know much better, but I would be wondering "was it
> > baseBeatLength or beatBaseLenth"? A shorter name would be easier to
> > remember. How about
> >
> > baseLength?
>
> baseLength is vague. Is
On 2024-10-03 07:38, Joram Noeck wrote:
You guys know much better, but I would be wondering "was it
baseBeatLength or beatBaseLenth"? A shorter name would be easier to
remember. How about
baseLength?
baseLength is vague. Is it a spatial length or a musical length?
--
Dan
You guys know much better, but I would be wondering "was it
baseBeatLength or beatBaseLenth"? A shorter name would be easier to
remember. How about
baseLength?
Sounds reasonable.
Michael
Am 03.10.2024 um 01:48 schrieb Dan Eble:
To follow up the replacement of make-moment by \musicLength [1], I
think it would make sense to rename baseMoment to beatBaseLength. Are
there any concerns or other suggestions?
On 2024-10-03 01:19, Saul Tobin wrote:
baseBeatLength? I don't have a strong opinion either way, but it seems like
another natural possibility.
I agree that that sounds more natural in English, but it sounds like the
length of a beat, which is not what it is (not necessarily).
--
Dan
