I can't remember. I'd just start with autotools and do ./configure, and work
my way through the output one package at a time.
Excuse my Phone spellcheck
From: Jacques Menu
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2019 2:32:07 AM
To: Carl Sorensen
Cc: Jacques Menu ; Marco At
Jacques Menu writes:
> Hello folks,
>
> Are there non user-supplied Scheme functions that typically account
> for much time in LilyPond runs?
>
> And if so, could they be replaced by C++ code without too much work?
This is hard to benchmark as it would require profiling at the Scheme
level. Mos
Hello folks,
Are there non user-supplied Scheme functions that typically account for much
time in LilyPond runs?
And if so, could they be replaced by C++ code without too much work?
JM
> Le 26 déc. 2019 à 23:42, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
>
> On 12/26/19, 3:39 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Jacques Menu"
> imj-muz...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>
>What is is exactly that fails when building LilyPond on those various
> OSes? Dependencies of some kind, or basic compilation problem
