Jacques Menu <imj-muz...@bluewin.ch> writes: > Hello folks, > > Are there non user-supplied Scheme functions that typically account > for much time in LilyPond runs? > > And if so, could they be replaced by C++ code without too much work?
This is hard to benchmark as it would require profiling at the Scheme level. Most of the inner loops accounting for much of the running time are pretty C++-heavy. -- David Kastrup
