Re: macOS 64-bit

>> [...] please send more generic questions to >> >> macports-us...@lists.macports.org ; >> >> the people on the list are quite responsive usually. > > Would it be better to email the “users” list about something like > setting the compiler as a build-phase dependency? From the > descriptions onli

Re: macOS 64-bit

> I'm the maintainer of the Portfile of `lilypond-devel'. Please send > patches to me. And please send more generic questions to > > macports-us...@lists.macports.org ; > > the people on the list are quite responsive usually. Would it be better to email the “users” list about something like settin

Re: macOS 64-bit

>> I think that the resulting bundle size of the `port mdmg' command >> can be greatly reduced if you improve the lilypond-devel package >> dependencies (i.e., adjusting the packages needed for building and >> running). Unfortunately, I don't have enough time right now to do >> it by myself; addit

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 08:14, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, >>> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the >>> `lilypond-devel' package. >> >> Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will >> probably be

Re: macOS 64-bit

Karlin High writes: > On 7/8/2019 8:30 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> I’ve also been reading about osxcross, which looks like it *might* >> do 64-bit builds now, though I can’t be sure from the available >> info. > > > "Please ensure

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:14 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, > >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the > >> `lilypond-devel' package. > > > > Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

>> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the >> `lilypond-devel' package. > > Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will > probably be with port mdmg, but I want to see if I can do better. I

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:58 AM Karlin High wrote: > On 7/8/2019 9:43 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable native > > 64-bit Mac build. > > I am very glad you are working on this. There hadn't been much > discussion on Mac builds lately

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:46 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable > > native 64-bit Mac build. > > You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, right? > Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the `lilypond-devel'

Re: macOS 64-bit

On 7/8/2019 9:43 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable native 64-bit Mac build. I am very glad you are working on this. There hadn't been much discussion on Mac builds lately, so I thought a quick review was in order. Sorry for any redun

Re: macOS 64-bit

> Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable > native 64-bit Mac build. You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the `lilypond-devel' package. Werner __

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:38 AM Karlin High wrote: > On 7/8/2019 8:30 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > I’ve also been reading about osxcross, which looks like it *might* do > 64-bit builds now, though I can’t be sure from the available info. > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On 7/8/2019 8:30 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: I’ve also been reading about osxcross, which looks like it *might* do 64-bit builds now, though I can’t be sure from the available info. "Please ensure you have read and understood the

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:02 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:48 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > >> >> Hmm. At this point I should probably stop speculating and set up a build >> environment. But I’m getting married in a month and am not committing to >> any big