>> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the >> `lilypond-devel' package. > > Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will > probably be with port mdmg, but I want to see if I can do better.
I think that the resulting bundle size of the `port mdmg' command can be greatly reduced if you improve the lilypond-devel package dependencies (i.e., adjusting the packages needed for building and running). Unfortunately, I don't have enough time right now to do it by myself; additionally, I'm not a MacOS user at all :-) Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel