Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/25/19, 5:25 PM, "Karlin High" wrote: On 2/25/2019 10:44 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > A further look into PureDarwin's website shows that many of the Darwin utilities in fact link to closed-source Apple libraries. > > So probably we can't even ship a command-line-only versi

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/25/2019 10:44 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote: A further look into PureDarwin's website shows that many of the Darwin utilities in fact link to closed-source Apple libraries. So probably we can't even ship a command-line-only version of LilyPond without having linking ability to OSX. Now, I exp

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/25/2019 1:22 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: I have just installed it, and it is 64 bit Curious, does the 64-bit resolve the out-of-memory errors that have been appearing in 32-bit versions? This thread, for example: -- Karl

problem with regtest's index.html

Hi, after running the regtests the file `lilypond-git/build/out/test-results/index.html` is created. Opening it in a browser the very first line is: click to filter rows by type: ly / profiling / signature / midi / log / gittxt / reset to all Those filtering-links don't work anymore, at least fo

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

> On 25 Feb 2019, at 19:20, Sven Axelsson wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 18:07, Hans Åberg wrote: > >> All stuff is already in MacPorts, it seems... > > Yes, I suppose the best thing to do is to make it easy for people to build > Lilypond themselves using MacPorts or Homebrew. I have just

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 18:07, Hans Åberg wrote: > > All stuff is already in MacPorts, it seems... > Yes, I suppose the best thing to do is to make it easy for people to build Lilypond themselves using MacPorts or Homebrew. Lilypond was removed from Homebrew a few years ago when they stopped supp

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

> On 25 Feb 2019, at 17:23, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > So I think one possibility in providing a functional lilypond 64-bit > executable for OSX is to only provide a command-line version, with a pointer > to use it with Frescobaldi. Not ideal, but perhaps better than saying "build > your own"

Re: Use "simple strings" rather than #"hash-prefixed Scheme strings" (issue 363910043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

On 2019/02/19 23:25:36, Valentin Villenave wrote: Rebase & remove now moot paragraph in CG (Thanks Carl!). Pushed as https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=ed86e71eb0f17e93036142938d8c490a3e2fcbea https://codereview.appspot.com/363910043/ ___

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/25/19, 5:23 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" wrote: Karlin High writes: > I'm still thinking it would be ideal if the macOS LilyPond could be > built as it now is. That's the least work for LilyPond build people, > and probably the best result for ma

Re: C++ cleanup : get rid of some compilation warnings (issue 353880043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

Pushed as https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=e94db23e6c620396aafba5dc2b30a4d2e5ef70e0 Thanks everyone! V. https://codereview.appspot.com/353880043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mai

Mention FILE or FOLDER arg to -o command-line option. (issue 343510043 by v.villen...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Message: Pushed as https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=3aeb41c27fa9db60eb6faa7c0c8532614697d06c Description: Mention FILE or FOLDER arg to -o command-line option. As Federico explained in issue #5288, this is mentioned in the Usage manual, but not in the man p

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/25/19, 5:23 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" wrote: Karlin High writes: > I'm still thinking it would be ideal if the macOS LilyPond could be > built as it now is. That's the least work for LilyPond build people, > and probably the best result for ma

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/25/2019 6:23 AM, David Kastrup wrote: That's why I suggested looking what is available for Darwin (I think OpenDarwin at some point of time closed shop but that was some time ago and I haven't followed developments). It seems OpenDarwin's been gone since 2006.

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

Karlin High writes: > I'm still thinking it would be ideal if the macOS LilyPond could be > built as it now is. That's the least work for LilyPond build people, > and probably the best result for macOS users. The question was not whether this was the best way but whether it was at all legal. I'

PATCHES - Countdown for Feb 25th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on February 28th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5481 relocate.cc: Rewrite relocation algorithm. - Werner LEMBERG

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

On 2/24/2019 5:10 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Hans Åberg writes: Xcode license: https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/xcode.pdf Well, I think that one is pretty clear: 2.5 Copies [...] For clarity, You may copy only the entire package or piece of the Apple Software and S