Karlin High <karlinh...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm still thinking it would be ideal if the macOS LilyPond could be > built as it now is. That's the least work for LilyPond build people, > and probably the best result for macOS users.
The question was not whether this was the best way but whether it was at all legal. I'd certainly want us to have a MacOSX installer that just falls out with as little per-version human effort as it and other installers do now. If Apple says "no" to using Xcode for that purpose, then we cannot argue our way out of that but there may be other development environments that we can make use of. That's why I suggested looking what is available for Darwin (I think OpenDarwin at some point of time closed shop but that was some time ago and I haven't followed developments). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
