Fwd: PATCHES - Countdown for June 4th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on June 7th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5332 \denies C should cancel \defaultchild C - Dan Eble https://source

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > >> I actually manage the team at google that develops gerrit, and yes, >> the new UI is much better, and I think it also much better than >> GitHub's pull-request model. >> >> I am happy to help with setting up an

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

On 6/4/2018 3:14 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I actually manage the team at google that develops gerrit, and yes, the new UI is much better, and I think it also much better than GitHub's pull-request model. I am happy to help with setting up an instance for LilyPond if that helps anyone. I had

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > I actually manage the team at google that develops gerrit, and yes, > the new UI is much better, and I think it also much better than > GitHub's pull-request model. > > I am happy to help with setting up an instance for LilyPond if that > helps anyone. > > FWIW. I think

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

I actually manage the team at google that develops gerrit, and yes, the new UI is much better, and I think it also much better than GitHub's pull-request model. I am happy to help with setting up an instance for LilyPond if that helps anyone. FWIW. I think the scaremongering about Microsoft's pla

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

Le lun. 4 juin 2018, à 15 h 17, Wols Lists a écrit : > On 04/06/18 17:58, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Looking at GitLab's features, their "labels" for status tracking, > >> > single-checkbox "squash merge" setting, and "resolvable discussions" > >> > would at least have a chance of meeting those ex

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

On 04/06/18 17:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> Looking at GitLab's features, their "labels" for status tracking, >> > single-checkbox "squash merge" setting, and "resolvable discussions" >> > would at least have a chance of meeting those expectations. > Frankly, I'd expect most systems to work better

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

Karlin High writes: > On 6/4/2018 10:17 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> $7.5B in stock. > > And their competitor GitLab promptly offered a 75% discount for one > year of their paid plans. They're claiming a 10x increase in projects > getting migrated onto their service. > >

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

On 6/4/2018 10:17 AM, David Kastrup wrote: $7.5B in stock. And their competitor GitLab promptly offered a 75% discount for one year of their paid plans. They're claiming a 10x increase in projects getting migrated onto their service.

Re: GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

On 04/06/18 16:17, David Kastrup wrote: > > $7.5B in stock. While I am not particularly happy that our issue/review > migration plans got us stranded on SourceForge, it looks like we at > least dodged a potentially larger bullet. > > Terms and Conditions for free project hosting already included

GitHub has been acquired by Microsoft

$7.5B in stock. While I am not particularly happy that our issue/review migration plans got us stranded on SourceForge, it looks like we at least dodged a potentially larger bullet. Terms and Conditions for free project hosting already included the caveat that projects may be cancelled at any t

Re: Issue 5335: Use covariant return types on virtual Grob::clone() (issue 341320043 by nine.fierce.ball...@gmail.com)

On 2018/06/04 07:00:58, dak wrote: I think that covariant return types predate C++11, right? 1998: http://www.drdobbs.com/whats-new-in-standard-c/184403580 Not really in the scope of this patch/issue any more, but ... I can probably afford to spend some time on that and submit a separate pa

Re: gs -dNOSAFER / windows

Am 01.06.2018 um 17:43 schrieb David Kastrup: Comments? Objections? Yes to not putting stuff like the file reading permissions on the command line. As ghostscript has problems with -dEPSCrop and .locksafe in eps files and ps files that include those eps files, I filed a bugreport.

Re: Issue 5335: Use covariant return types on virtual Grob::clone() (issue 341320043 by nine.fierce.ball...@gmail.com)

At any rate: LGTM I think that covariant return types predate C++11, right? https://codereview.appspot.com/341320043/diff/20001/lily/system.cc File lily/system.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/341320043/diff/20001/lily/system.cc#newcode449 lily/system.cc:449: dynamic_cast (c[j])->se