Reviewers: ,
Message:
please review
Description:
Let repeatTie work inside of event-chord
The previous coding of repeat-tie-engraver.cc is replaced by the
renamed coding of the laissez-vibrer-engraver.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/335910043/
Affected files (+37, -21 li
2017-10-21 14:04 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2017-10-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> on user it's complained that repeatTie is not printed in chord. Most recent:
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00290.html
>>>
>>> Because
2017-10-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> on user it's complained that repeatTie is not printed in chord. Most recent:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00290.html
>>
>> Because I don't know C++ I simply tested to copy all from
>>
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi,
>
> on user it's complained that repeatTie is not printed in chord. Most recent:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00290.html
>
> Because I don't know C++ I simply tested to copy all from
> laissez-vibrer-tie-engraver.cc into repeat-tie-engra
Hi,
on user it's complained that repeatTie is not printed in chord. Most recent:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00290.html
Because I don't know C++ I simply tested to copy all from
laissez-vibrer-tie-engraver.cc into repeat-tie-engraver.cc, renaming
all ofcourse.
I hav
2017-10-21 9:45 GMT+02:00 James Lowe :
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:58:37 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "James Lowe" writes:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
>> > October 20th.
>> >
>> > A quick synopsis of all patches curr
Hello,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:58:37 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> "James Lowe" writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
> > October 20th.
> >
> > A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
> > found here:
>