2017-10-21 14:04 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: > 2017-10-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> on user it's complained that repeatTie is not printed in chord. Most recent: >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00290.html >>> >>> Because I don't know C++ I simply tested to copy all from >>> laissez-vibrer-tie-engraver.cc into repeat-tie-engraver.cc, renaming >>> all ofcourse. >>> I have a successful build. >>> >>> The example works: >>> { >>> < >>> c'\laissezVibrer >>> e' >>> g'^\repeatTie >>> > >>> } >>> >>> Right now I wait for make check finishing. >>> Have to leave soon, results probably in the evening, though. >>> >>> Could it be that easy?? >> >> Well, it's usually not all that much harder than that, but I'd expect a >> few spots to require changes in order to make up for more fundamental >> differences. Note that the Rhythmic_event_iterator will check for stuff >> like { g'\repeatTie } whether there is an engraver listening before >> deciding whether to leave the event to the discretion of the likes of >> "New_fingering_engraver" and keep it on the g' or whether to strip it >> off and announce it separately to engravers. >> >> So there may be other side effects _outside_ of chords by adding such an >> engraver. >> >> -- >> David Kastrup > > Apart from merge-rests-engraver.ly regtest I've now a clean make check. > Though, in the light of your remarks I'll do some more tests before > even thinking of providing a patch... > > Cheers, > Harm
Ok, further testing didn't show anything fishy, so I'll go for a patch. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
