Combining them means that the size of the final PDF may be smaller but
the size
of the intermediate PDFs will be larger.
In my experiment, even if there is a bug in gs's full set font
embedding, the
disk size that `make doc` eats has increased.
I did not check that, but I would expect an i
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:01:06AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> ElRay writes:
>>
>> > FYI: This has been reported as a bug -- in 2012.I will see if this is
>> > something I can take-on in the next month or two.
>>
>> I am pretty sure that Graham posted a patch for
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
September 26th
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
5197 Include direction marker in post-event location - David K
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:01:06AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> ElRay writes:
>
> > FYI: This has been reported as a bug -- in 2012.I will see if this is
> > something I can take-on in the next month or two.
>
> I am pretty sure that Graham posted a patch for this on one of the lists
> one of
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/324490043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2017-09-23 19:04 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels :
>
> James wrote Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:05 AM
>
>
>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:24:31 +0200
>> Thomas Morley wrote:
>>
>>> for about a month I'm often surprised about new issues/patches etc.
>>> I _am_ subscribed to the lilypond-auto mailing-list which
Hi everybody!
The removal of the PDFDontUseFontObjectNum option in ghostscript caused a lot
of headache during the last days.
Lilypond provides since early 2015 a way to persuade ghostscript to remove
duplicated fonts from pdfs.
Later the extractpdfmark program was introduced to allow links to
James wrote Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:05 AM
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:24:31 +0200
> Thomas Morley wrote:
>
>> for about a month I'm often surprised about new issues/patches etc.
>> I _am_ subscribed to the lilypond-auto mailing-list which should
>> notify me about stuff from the tracker.
>>
`-dgs-never-embed-fonts` doesn't effect for TrueType fonts.
Therefore, when both `-dgs-never-embed-fonts` and `--bigpdfs`/`-b` are
used at the same time, TrueType fonts are embedded as full set (ie
non-subset). (if there is no bug in gs.)
On the other hand, some intermeiate PDFs use Japanese TrueT
Reviewers: dak,
Message:
On 2017/09/23 16:02:32, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/325630043/diff/1/make/lilypond-vars.make
File make/lilypond-vars.make (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/325630043/diff/1/make/lilypond-vars.make#newcode54
make/lilypond-vars.make:54: -dgs-never-
https://codereview.appspot.com/325630043/diff/1/make/lilypond-vars.make
File make/lilypond-vars.make (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/325630043/diff/1/make/lilypond-vars.make#newcode54
make/lilypond-vars.make:54: -dgs-never-embed-fonts -b
Is there a conceivable application for using -b wi
Dear Hosoda-san,
Thank you for posting very detailed package to reproduce the issue,
it was far detailed than I expected. Please let me spend some time
to check it, due to I'm absent from my office in next week...
Regards,
mpsuzuki
Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
>> In my impression, if
>>
>> $ gs -dSAF
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Also, is lilypond really an online tool?
I noticed that, too. Then I remembered lilybin.com.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
> Note that I didn't attempt this on 9.21, just the 9.22 release
> candidate. While the fonts are properly dropped from the individual
> PDF files, none of the text was visible in the final PDF file, when
> rebuilding with Emmentaler supplied as an external font in fontmap.GS.
>
> Its interesting
At 02:35 23/09/2017 +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote:
> Converting to TeX format would probably work, but apparently there
> were problems with that.
>
> Is there some other approach available ?
There is a method of using font non-embedded PDF.
In my experiment, it seems to work fine except TrueT
Francisco Vila writes:
> On 22/09/17 16:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Well, the exposure is a bit limited, given that their list is not
>> accessible from their home page and is not even listed on their site
>> map.
>>
>> I am somewhat afraid that at least currently this does not look like
>> mu
On 22/09/17 16:47, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Well, the exposure is a bit limited, given that their list is not
> accessible from their home page and is not even listed on their site
> map.
>
> I am somewhat afraid that at least currently this does not look like
> much more than astroturfing. Even s
17 matches
Mail list logo
