Am 28/10/16 um 11:01 schrieb David Kastrup:
Robert Schmaus writes:
Hi everyone,
I've never used implicit voice assignment and I doubt I will start with it now.
But since there's no real need for the ordering of voices _in the
code_ to match the vertical arrangement of the _engraved_ notes
LGTM!
https://codereview.appspot.com/312970043/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/312970043/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode602
Documentation/usage/running.itely:602: @tab Ghostscript never embe
LGTM. Thanks for working on this.
https://codereview.appspot.com/315850043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2016/10/27 15:50:14, lemzwerg wrote:
> Other version of URW fonts do not seem to have OTF format.
The link you are showing points to a directory where the fonts come in
all three
flavours.
> C059-BdIta.otf
... in the ghostscript-9.20.tar.gz bundle the URW fonts don't have an
extens
Robert Schmaus writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've never used implicit voice assignment and I doubt I will start with it
> now.
>
> But since there's no real need for the ordering of voices _in the
> code_ to match the vertical arrangement of the _engraved_ notes (and
> isn't that also, what Lilypo
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
October 31st.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://Philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
__
Push:
4985 Avoid a few trivial lambda function wrappers - David
Hi everyone,
I've never used implicit voice assignment and I doubt I will start with it now.
But since there's no real need for the ordering of voices _in the code_ to
match the vertical arrangement of the _engraved_ notes (and isn't that also,
what Lilypond is all about? You specify the inpu
