On 2016/10/27 15:50:14, lemzwerg wrote:
> Other version of URW fonts do not seem to have OTF format.
The link you are showing points to a directory where the fonts come in
all three
flavours.
> C059-BdIta.otf
... in the ghostscript-9.20.tar.gz bundle the URW fonts don't have an
extension
and are still in Type1 format.
It's not clear to me whether we can expect OTF versions of the URW
fonts all the
time.
Anyways, I think your solution should work :-)
I've created Issue 4991 for it. https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4991/ https://codereview.appspot.com/316800043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
