David Kastrup writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> it would appear that the graphics card on my laptop died on me. After
> an hour of black screen, it now managed to shut down and reboot in some
> low-resolution mode. I don't know how often I'll manage that however.
> I'll likely need to take this one apart
Hi folks,
it would appear that the graphics card on my laptop died on me. After
an hour of black screen, it now managed to shut down and reboot in some
low-resolution mode. I don't know how often I'll manage that however.
I'll likely need to take this one apart and look for loose connectors
and
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
July 31st
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
__
Push:
4904 Reimplement issue 4781 for musicxml2ly more literally. -
Hi folks
I'm trying to build lilypond with GUB following the instructions in:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/notes-on-builds-with-gub
`make bootstrap` was successful, but `make lilypond` is causing an
error (full log attached).
I'm running Debian stable 64-bit (both O
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>>
How does that differ from symbols?
>>> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
>>> LilyPond code, isn't it?
>> Can y
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>>> How does that differ from symbols?
>> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
>> LilyPond code, isn't it?
> Can you give an example for symbo
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>
>> How does that differ from symbols?
>
> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
> LilyPond code, isn't it?
Can you give an example for symbols "entered as LilyPond code" as
opposed to "in the Sch
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Urs Liska writes:
>>>
Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>>> to optionally s
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>> to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
>> s
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
> to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
> spanner's information is sh
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>>> > to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
>>> > spanner's information is shared (although I am not sure how that would
>>> > be
Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>> > to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
>> > spanner's information is shared (although I am not sure how that would
>> > be done with a key-list, si
Nathan Chou writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried the same idea with context properties, and it seems to
> work just as well as my previous approach with a static member. (To
> summarize: cross voice spanners and the voice they currently belong to
> are stored in a property of some context containing
Hello,
I have tried the same idea with context properties, and it seems to
work just as well as my previous approach with a static member. (To
summarize: cross voice spanners and the voice they currently belong to
are stored in a property of some context containing both voices, like
Score. Each vo
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Kobel"
To: "Phil Holmes" ;
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fun with upgrades - not
Hi Phil,
I had a bit of trouble to parse your setup description. IIUC, you used to
have a machine with
- Ubuntu 10.04 running natively as h
15 matches
Mail list logo
