On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:34 AM, James wrote:
> Hello
>
> The following patches have been at 'please push' for the last 3 countdowns
> (i.e. over 9 days), and I am not seeing anything obvious that leads me to
> believe that their is 'Needs Work' on them. I am seeing recent emails from
> them on
2014/1/12 Janek Warchoł
> Hi,
>
> 2014/1/12 James
>
>> Hello
>>
>> The following patches have been at 'please push' for the last 3
>> countdowns (i.e. over 9 days), and I am not seeing anything obvious that
>> leads me to believe that their is 'Needs Work' on them. I am seeing recent
>> emails f
Reviewers: Keith,
Message:
Keith,
first of all: i apologize for the delay. I shouldn't have put this up
for review when being too busy to reply in time, it's my mistake. I
thought the patch was obvious (while it wasn't, and in fact i have
misunderstood the code) - i should know better now...
On 12.01.2014, at 19:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Carl Sorensen" ; "James" ;
> "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 6:24 PM
> Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
>
>
>> - Original Message ---
2014/1/12 pls :
>
> On 12.01.2014, at 19:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
>>> Latest version is attached. Needs dotted tuplet brackets, a bit of tidying
>>> of positioning, alternative time signature format, move of clef in LH of 2nd
>>> bar and I thin
On 12.01.2014, at 19:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Carl Sorensen" ; "James" ;
> "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 6:24 PM
> Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
>
>
>> - Original Message ---
On 1/12/14 8:04 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Phil Holmes"
>To: "James" ; "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
>
>Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:32 PM
>Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
>
>
>
>Fairly certain the clash is caused by the crossing mu
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "James" ; "Werner LEMBERG" ; "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
- Original Message -
From: James
To: Werner LEMBERG ; Devel
The pedal symbol clashes with the d
- Original Message -
From: James
To: Werner LEMBERG ; Devel
The pedal symbol clashes with the dynamic in bar 3 and there is a clash
of a tuplets in the second upper bar with accidentals - which I believe is
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3766
Anyway, I have done
James schrieb:
>On 12/01/14 09:43, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Hi devels,
>>>
>>> would please someone push the attached patches to staging?
>>>
>>> I've chained them on top of staging
>>> (19fa6068cf3a7c5f02c13d5b57be895665da00bf) by cherry-picking them to
>>> _one_ branch
On 12/01/14 09:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Urs Liska writes:
Hi devels,
would please someone push the attached patches to staging?
I've chained them on top of staging
(19fa6068cf3a7c5f02c13d5b57be895665da00bf) by cherry-picking them to
_one_ branch (not single branches for each patch)
and succ
2014/1/11 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Janek,
>
> Thank you for all your continuing and wonderful work on curves in particular,
> and Lilypond in general!
Why, thanks! I'm not sure if you're not exaggerating, i've been
failing to keep up recently and i think i failed some people because
of my lack of
Hi,
2014/1/12 James
> Hello
>
> The following patches have been at 'please push' for the last 3 countdowns
> (i.e. over 9 days), and I am not seeing anything obvious that leads me to
> believe that their is 'Needs Work' on them. I am seeing recent emails from
> them on the lists and so assume th
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi devels,
>
> would please someone push the attached patches to staging?
>
> I've chained them on top of staging
> (19fa6068cf3a7c5f02c13d5b57be895665da00bf) by cherry-picking them to
> _one_ branch (not single branches for each patch)
>
> and successfully ran make website.
Hi devels,
would please someone push the attached patches to staging?
I've chained them on top of staging
(19fa6068cf3a7c5f02c13d5b57be895665da00bf) by cherry-picking them to
_one_ branch (not single branches for each patch)
and successfully ran make website.
Thanks
Urs
>From f23a749ea217b4d683
On 2014/01/12 08:59:46, dak wrote:
How about
define-variables =
#(define-void-function (parser location syms) (symbol-list?)
(for-each
(lambda (sym)
(if (null? (ly:parser-lookup parser sym))
(ly:parser-define parser sym *unspecified*)
If you write \name fo
"Janek Warchoł" schrieb:
>2014/1/12 Carl Peterson :
>> What I would *ultimately* like is the ability for someone to visually
>write
>> each part on separate staves (or using two staves with two voices
>each),
>> then those parts are translated into the template without any direct
>code
>> manipu
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2014/1/12 Carl Peterson :
>> What I would *ultimately* like is the ability for someone to visually
>> write each part on separate staves (or using two staves with two
>> voices each), then those parts are translated into the template
>> without any direct code manipulation
On 2014/01/12 08:05:30, Devon Schudy wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
> At any rate, I'm not really happy with the macro usage at top level
> here: I think it would be better if the basic assembly was rather
done
> by music or Scheme functions
I'm not really happy with it either, because users ha
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/50400044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2014/1/12 Carl Peterson :
> What I would *ultimately* like is the ability for someone to visually write
> each part on separate staves (or using two staves with two voices each),
> then those parts are translated into the template without any direct code
> manipulation. The visual interface would b
David Kastrup wrote:
> At any rate, I'm not really happy with the macro usage at top level
> here: I think it would be better if the basic assembly was rather done
> by music or Scheme functions
I'm not really happy with it either, because users have no hope of
modifying it or learning from it. Th
22 matches
Mail list logo
