> I think this happened when I updated the source before submitting.
> How do I get it out?
You have to upload a new patch set (using the same issue ID on
rietveld).
> On 2013/12/24 00:57:53, lemzwerg wrote:
>> Please stay in the 80-char-per-line limit.
>
> Does MF allow for line wrapping inside
https://codereview.appspot.com/45160043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/45160043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#oldcode1387
Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:1
LGTM, codewise. Since I don't use Sacred Harp notation, I can't give
further comments w.r.t. usefulness or correctness.
https://codereview.appspot.com/45160043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (left):
https://codereview.appspot
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Patch for review to make shaped noteheads conform more closely to
personally-observed practice.
Description:
Cleanup of ugly MI and SOL shaped noteheads
1. Reducing width of MI notehead, for both "regular" (Aiken, etc.)
and "small" (Funk/Walker) heads. When Funk/Walker
James writes:
> On 23/12/13 12:26, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 23.12.2013 13:02, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Urs Liska writes:
>>>
Am 23.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Urs Liska:
> Attached is an updated patch using @command instead of @code.
> Rebased patch passes make doc (issues in other
On 23/12/13 12:26, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.12.2013 13:02, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 23.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Urs Liska:
Attached is an updated patch using @command instead of @code.
Rebased patch passes make doc (issues in other subthread solved).
Thanks for pushing
Urs
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 23.12.2013 13:02, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 23.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Urs Liska:
>>>
Attached is an updated patch using @command instead of @code.
Rebased patch passes make doc (issues in other subthread solved).
Thanks for p
Am 23.12.2013 13:02, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 23.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Urs Liska:
Attached is an updated patch using @command instead of @code.
Rebased patch passes make doc (issues in other subthread solved).
Thanks for pushing
Urs
Sorry, found an error after reading
Am 22.12.2013 12:06, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 22.12.2013 10:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
I see that you used @code{vi} and @code{git-cl} rather than @command{vi}
and @command{git-cl}: any particular reason for that?
I was suggested to use that on Rietveld.
So, no, no parti
