Re: Fedora 19 comes with guile 2.0.9 - cannot use 2.17.22

2013-07-20 Thread Ian Hulin
On 20/07/13 23:54, Ian Hulin wrote: > On 20/07/13 22:25, Julien Rioux wrote: >> On 20/07/2013 5:00 PM, Ian Hulin wrote: >>> On 13/07/13 20:51, Frédéric Bron wrote: >> >> I got started already, see >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3461. I don't >> think that we need a guile-1

Re: Fedora 19 comes with guile 2.0.9 - cannot use 2.17.22

2013-07-20 Thread Ian Hulin
On 20/07/13 22:25, Julien Rioux wrote: > On 20/07/2013 5:00 PM, Ian Hulin wrote: >> On 13/07/13 20:51, Frédéric Bron wrote: I don't think ./configure should do this automatically, but at the very least, it should fail when it finds a guile version that is incompatible with our source

T3154 work - round 2 - question.

2013-07-20 Thread Ian Hulin
Thanks for replies to the last enquiry, David, I'll try and be a little more coherent in this one (despite the 30C tempertures here in the UK). You asked in your reply in the last thread: "The question is whether it even makes sense trying to go through \midi or whether one should actually use the

Re: Fedora 19 comes with guile 2.0.9 - cannot use 2.17.22

2013-07-20 Thread Frédéric Bron
> Could you make the Guile-1 compatibility a separate issue from 3382, > which is about tex-info versions? Oh, sorry that you missed that but Julien fixed this already: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3461 Frédéric ___ lilypond-devel

Re: Fedora 19 comes with guile 2.0.9 - cannot use 2.17.22

2013-07-20 Thread Julien Rioux
On 20/07/2013 5:00 PM, Ian Hulin wrote: On 13/07/13 20:51, Frédéric Bron wrote: I don't think ./configure should do this automatically, but at the very least, it should fail when it finds a guile version that is incompatible with our source code. Can you please open an issue for it\? good poin

Re: Fedora 19 comes with guile 2.0.9 - cannot use 2.17.22

2013-07-20 Thread Ian Hulin
On 13/07/13 20:51, Frédéric Bron wrote: >> I don't think ./configure should do this automatically, but at >> the very least, it should fail when it finds a guile version that >> is incompatible with our source code. Can you please open an >> issue for it\? > > good point, I will do that. Frédéric

Re: LilyPond internships and LilyPond graduation projects. MusicXML export!

2013-07-20 Thread Paul Morris
This is good news Janek. One project that might be appropriate is working on integrating the improvements to musicxml2ly that the Philomelos team have made on their own fork, but haven't had time to contribute back upstream. That seems like low-hanging fruit that should be picked. As David K men

Re: upgrade to c++11

2013-07-20 Thread Benkő Pál
hi David, > The probability that some envelope-finding code dropped into LilyPond > by a typical LilyPond contributor is close to the quality of somebody > who wrote a Phd thesis focused around the topic is slim. I did write a Phd thesis not very far from that. the time I can spend on LilyPond

Re: LilyPond internships and LilyPond graduation projects. MusicXML export!

2013-07-20 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł writes: > Now, there's an even more awesome thing: i've talked with another guy > who coordinates the "team programming project" course for 3rd-year > students (which results in undergraduate thesis for the team members). > The thing is that the coordinator wants the projects to be