Graham Percival writes:
> [1] why oh why does the main GNU editor not use the "official
> extension language for the GNU operating system"??
Same reason why its keyboard shortcuts are only so-so compatible with
CUA and/or GNOME: its development was started more than 30 years ago,
when nobody had
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:23 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> Development has slowed to a trickle. I'm not certain if this is
>> just because it's late spring (i.e. busy academic time), or if
>> people are holding their breaths waiting f
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:14:24AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> To amplify my reply to Federico: if developers create similar
> tracker items and attach a trivial patch without creating a Rietveld
> issue, it would be very helpful if they would update the tracker
> item as "patch-new" or perhaps
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:54:45AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 12-04-20 12:36 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> >can you please tell me if it's normal that my patch has been ignored?
> >It's a very trivial patch, maybe I didn't follow the right procedure?
Hi Federico,
Please follow this procedure
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > It reflects the news entries in the repository. When a new LilyPond
> > Report appears, it _is_ announced there.
>
> Yes, it is. However, in the last 20 months only 2 out
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Le 19/04/2012 21:30, Graham Percival disait :
> >- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, other than
> > translators, who may merge with that if they want to and don't
> > break anything.
> > The question of wheth
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:27:20AM -0700, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > Trying to anticipate future problems, I recalled guile
> > indentation:
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/4896043/
>
> I would be happy to tackle this and *hope* to have a
Le 19/04/2012 21:30, Graham Percival disait :
We have a new release candidate, slower development, highlights on
development problems, and a vacation.
RELEASE CANDIDATE
As always, this means:
- activity on master goes on as normal.
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, other than
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Trying to anticipate future problems, I recalled guile
> indentation:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4896043/
> My impression is that it would only take an hour or two to fix
> this, and then we could standardize all the scheme indentatio
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> What about a news item about Enseble 101's tour? It seems reasonable
>> to me; a short notice without "advertisement content" (i.e. without
>> that Kickstarter part i guess) shouldn't be offensive, and it could
>
On Apr 17, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Could we sum up the discussion?
> As I understand: for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
>{
>}
>
> is ok, right? I will wait for two OKs and then make changes and produce and
> upload a patch.
>
> Łukasz
>
LGTM.
Before you tackle this,
Colin Campbell writes:
> To amplify my reply to Federico: if developers create similar tracker
> items and attach a trivial patch without creating a Rietveld issue, it
> would be very helpful if they would update the tracker item as
> "patch-new" or perhaps even as "patch-review". I recognise th
On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> We have a new release candidate, slower development, highlights on
> development problems, and a vacation.
>
>
> SLOWER DEVELOPMENT
>
> Development has slowed to a trickle. I'm not certain if this is
> just because it's late spring (i.e. bu
On 12-04-20 06:54 AM, Colin Campbell wrote:
Hello, Federico
I've put your patch straight onto the countdown, and it may be that
one of the senior developers will give the OK to push it without
further review.
The reason it was overlooked is that, yes, you did go a bit outside
the usual cha
On 12-04-20 12:36 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il 20/04/2012 04:31, Colin Campbell ha scritto:
Echoing Graham's comment on the pace of development slowing, we have no
patches to push, none on countdown and none to review.
Hi Colin,
can you please tell me if it's normal that my patch has been ig
Janek Warchoł writes:
> What about a news item about Enseble 101's tour? It seems reasonable
> to me; a short notice without "advertisement content" (i.e. without
> that Kickstarter part i guess) shouldn't be offensive, and it could
> link to appropriate productions entry and/or Ensemble 101 web
On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> What about a news item about Enseble 101's tour? It seems reasonable
> to me; a short notice without "advertisement content" (i.e. without
> that Kickstarter part i guess) shouldn't be offensive, and it could
> link to appropriate productions e
What about a news item about Enseble 101's tour? It seems reasonable
to me; a short notice without "advertisement content" (i.e. without
that Kickstarter part i guess) shouldn't be offensive, and it could
link to appropriate productions entry and/or Ensemble 101 website to
give more info.
Actuall
On 2012/04/19 22:25:17, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
The real-estate value of the upper right corner of http://lilypond.org
is huge.
Currently it is unexploited property, just sitting there. If there
are people
who can offer LilyPond-friendly exchanges for it that fulfill the
criteria of
James writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne wrote:
>> The documentation at
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for
>> both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must
>> come *before* the grob to which the footnote
20 matches
Mail list logo
