On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:36 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/5001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode330
> lily/axis-group-interface.cc:330: ||
> Pure_from_neighbor_interface::has_interface (me))
> Now that the engraver is working correctly, do you still n
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/5001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/5001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode330
lily/axis-group-interface.cc:330: ||
Pure_from_neighbor_interface::has_interface (me))
N
On 19 Mar 2012, at 23:36, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:03:29PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
>> On 19 Mar 2012, at 15:50, Colin Hall wrote:
>>
>>> You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has
>>> been released. It would be great to hear if it works for you
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:11:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> So instead of surprising volunteers by giving them more information than
>> expected we give them less information than expected?
>
> Bug squad members shouldn't be reading
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:11:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> So instead of surprising volunteers by giving them more information than
> expected we give them less information than expected?
Bug squad members shouldn't be reading tracker messages anyway.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documenta
Graham Percival writes:
> We have a new mailing list for automatic messages. No human
> emails are allowed; only whitelisted email addresses can send to
> the list.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-auto
>
> Scripts whose output should be sent to this list include:
>
> - patchy
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:50:41PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond
> has been released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on
> your respective platforms so that I can update the table below.
> I'll post updates as they co
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:03:29PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2012, at 15:50, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> > You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has
> > been released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on your
> > respective platforms so
We have a new mailing list for automatic messages. No human
emails are allowed; only whitelisted email addresses can send to
the list.
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-auto
Scripts whose output should be sent to this list include:
- patchy staging-merge (both success and failure
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:36:03PM -0400, Carey, Norman wrote:
> Thanks so much for your help.
I did very little. There's a dedicated and talented team of developers who
really deserve your thanks. I've copied this reply to the developer mailing
list.
> I was reluctant to download the unstable
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Some of you may already know about this, but it won't hurt to read
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/studentallocations
> (most importantly the beginning and point 4).
With regards to point 4 - wouldn't it make sense to add t
David Kastrup writes:
> Julien Rioux writes:
>
>> Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:24:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> > I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
>>> > /tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
>>> > and a hierar
Folks,
you might consider the topic of this blog entry quite off-topic, but
it shows some details on how to profile Scheme. It was quite
interesting to read, however, I understand only a small percentage :-)
http://wingolog.org/archives/2012/03/08/an-in-depth-look-at-the-performance-of-guil
Julien Rioux writes:
> Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:24:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
>> > /tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
>> > and a hierarchy of "build" directories under
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:24:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
> > /tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
> > and a hierarchy of "build" directories under it, possibly one per tested
On 19 Mar 2012, at 15:50, Colin Hall wrote:
> You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has been
> released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on your respective
> platforms so that I can update the table below.
Typesetting a small example in the GUI works
Hi All,
You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has been
released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on your respective
platforms so that I can update the table below.
|-+-++-+-+-|
| MacOS X | x
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:24:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
> /tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
> and a hierarchy of "build" directories under it, possibly one per tested
> patch (?).
nope, nothing to do with Patchy.
>
I find that in my patchy runs, I get directories
/tmp/lilypond-autobuild (my configured build directory)
and a hierarchy of "build" directories under it, possibly one per tested
patch (?).
Here is the output of
ls /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/build/build/build/build/
GNUmakefile local.make
If I loo
Some of you may already know about this, but it won't hurt to read
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/studentallocations
(most importantly the beginning and point 4).
cheers,
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
20 matches
Mail list logo
