Re: Adds padding between Hairpins and SpanBars. (issue 5438060)

2011-12-04 Thread k-ohara5a5a
On 2011/12/05 06:53:18, MikeSol wrote: The issue is that if I did this, an arriving hairpin would be in its own "concurrent-hairpins" grob array. I thought that was the idea, because that is the array of all hairpins that are checked for span-bar closeness. Somehow the current hairpin has to

Re: More nuanced BarLine extra-spacing-height to allow tighter horizontal spacing (issue 5434104)

2011-12-04 Thread dak
http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm File scm/output-lib.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode408 scm/output-lib.scm:408: (define-public (pure-from-neighbor-interface::account-for-span-bar grob) On 2011/12/05 06:00:05, Kei

Re: Adds padding between Hairpins and SpanBars. (issue 5438060)

2011-12-04 Thread mtsolo
http://codereview.appspot.com/5438060/diff/14024/lily/concurrent-hairpin-engraver.cc File lily/concurrent-hairpin-engraver.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5438060/diff/14024/lily/concurrent-hairpin-engraver.cc#newcode79 lily/concurrent-hairpin-engraver.cc:79: for (vsize j = i + 1; j <

Re: More nuanced BarLine extra-spacing-height to allow tighter horizontal spacing (issue 5434104)

2011-12-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 5, 2011 à 7:00 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net a écrit : > LGTM, > considering the lame programming language you had to use. I <3 Scheme. Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond

Re: More nuanced BarLine extra-spacing-height to allow tighter horizontal spacing (issue 5434104)

2011-12-04 Thread k-ohara5a5a
LGTM, considering the lame programming language you had to use. At first it looked like you were shortening the extra-spacing-height symmetrically above and below, but then I converted to a real man's programming language and all became clear. http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/out

PATCH: Countdown to 20111206

2011-12-04 Thread Colin Campbell
For 21:00 MST Tuesday December 6, 2011 Enhancement: Issue 2067 : Patch: Give \displayLilyMusic and \displayMusic optional port arguments. - R 5437101 Issue 2069

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread Ralf Mattes
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:53:31 +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > Le Dec 4, 2011 à 6:43 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : > >> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:57:27 +, Ralf Mattes wrote: >> >> >>> My point ;-) Lilypond's svg output is way to unstructured! SVG >>> everything in place to mark up semantic uni

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 4, 2011 à 6:43 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : > On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:57:27 +, Ralf Mattes wrote: > > >> My point ;-) Lilypond's svg output is way to unstructured! SVG >> everything in place to mark up semantic units - just add a lily:mark >> attribute. BTW, this would make editing of lil

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 4, 2011 à 5:57 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : > On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:19:50 +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > >> Le Dec 4, 2011 à 4:51 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : >> >>> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:12:55 +, mtsolo wrote: >>> Reviewers: , Message: Hey all, I'm

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread Ralf Mattes
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:57:27 +, Ralf Mattes wrote: > My point ;-) Lilypond's svg output is way to unstructured! SVG > everything in place to mark up semantic units - just add a lily:mark > attribute. BTW, this would make editing of lilypond's output so much > more easy. One more nice thing ab

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread Ralf Mattes
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:19:50 +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > Le Dec 4, 2011 à 4:51 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : > >> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:12:55 +, mtsolo wrote: >> >>> Reviewers: , >>> >>> Message: >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I'm working on a piece w/ scripted SVG, and this'll make it easier

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 4, 2011 à 4:51 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : > On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:12:55 +, mtsolo wrote: > >> Reviewers: , >> >> Message: >> Hey all, >> >> I'm working on a piece w/ scripted SVG, and this'll make it easier for >> me to parse the file in Python and move things around. Try it with: >

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread Ralf Mattes
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:12:55 +, mtsolo wrote: > Reviewers: , > > Message: > Hey all, > > I'm working on a piece w/ scripted SVG, and this'll make it easier for > me to parse the file in Python and move things around. Try it with: > > \relative c' { >\override NoteHead #'framing-comment

Re: center NoteColumn

2011-12-04 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:31 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > (See attached file.) > > Oops--that only accidentally works for your problem example since I goofed the filtering. Replace the second definition of lst-2 in the file I last attached with this line and all should be well: (lst-2

Re: center NoteColumn

2011-12-04 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Harm, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Thomas Morley < thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote: the attached code is my attempt to center a NoteColumn in a measure (like > MultiMeasureRest). > > This is really cool! > > While it works fine in most cases, there is one major problem: > Having a k

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> Well, if the code whizs are too lazy documenting what they know and >> choose to frolic on the beach instead, they might at least be useful >> for proofreading between two sips of Bacardi, don't you think? > > :-) > > Calm down, David. Noone is complaining about your wo

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Well, if the code whizs are too lazy documenting what they know and > choose to frolic on the beach instead, they might at least be useful > for proofreading between two sips of Bacardi, don't you think? :-) Calm down, David. Noone is complaining about your work (on the contrary, we all very m

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > Le Dec 4, 2011 à 11:27 AM, Graham Percival a écrit : > >> >> There's lots of untrustworthy syntax floating around in the docs, >> and James and I (more him than me) have been doing our best to >> straighten it out. We could really use some advanced[1] users to

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > There's lots of untrustworthy syntax floating around in the docs, > and James and I (more him than me) have been doing our best to > straighten it out. We could really use some advanced[1] users to > help out. > > [1] if you know what "\with" does, then you're "advanced

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 4, 2011 à 11:27 AM, Graham Percival a écrit : > > There's lots of untrustworthy syntax floating around in the docs, > and James and I (more him than me) have been doing our best to > straighten it out. We could really use some advanced[1] users to > help out. > > [1] if you know what "\w

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:00:31AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > James writes: > > > As has always been stated, no is asking for documentation tracker > > entries to be 'verbatim and polished or even complete' when they are > > created, but it sure would help if 'something' was added - even if it

Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-04 Thread mtsolo
Reviewers: , Message: Hey all, I'm working on a piece w/ scripted SVG, and this'll make it easier for me to parse the file in Python and move things around. Try it with: \relative c' { \override NoteHead #'framing-comments = #'("NoteHead coming up." . "NoteHead finished.") \repeat unfold

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > Hello, > > On 4 December 2011 07:57, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > > Overall lesson: it seems that we should have reviews for more > doc > > items than we did previously, since neither James nor I are > > qualified to deal with advanced lilypond concepts. >

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-04 Thread James
Hello, On 4 December 2011 07:57, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > Overall lesson: it seems that we should have reviews for more doc > > items than we did previously, since neither James nor I are > > qualified to deal with advanced lilypond concepts. > > It is somewhat audacious to assume that a who