http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode408 scm/output-lib.scm:408: (define-public (pure-from-neighbor-interface::account-for-span-bar grob) On 2011/12/05 06:00:05, Keith wrote:
Golly gee! Is this how you have to loop over a pair in this language?
Scheme
must be for losers. I'm glad I use more powerful languages like
FORTRAN77.
IF .NOT.has-span-bar(UP) esh(UP) = min(esh(UP), 1.01) ENDIF IF .NOT.( has-span-bar(DOWN).AND.allow-span-bar ) esh(DOWN)= max(esh(DOWN), -1.01) ENDIF
No, this is just Mike's entry for the obfuscated programming contest. This actually is just (define-public (pure-from-neighbor-interface::account-for-span-bar grob) (let* ((esh (pure-from-neighbor-interface::extra-spacing-height grob)) (hsb (ly:grob-property grob 'has-span-bar)) (ii (interval-intersection esh (cons -1.01 1.01))) (if (pair? hsb) (cons (car (if (and (cdr hsb) (ly:grob-property grob 'allow-span-bar)) esh ii)) (cdr (if (car hsb) esh ii))) ii)))) Putting a loop here is plain insanity since it contains just two iterations, and with quite different code in them. http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel