this is the kind of patch that can in theory be pushed directly to
staging, although in this case I'm glad there was a review first.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5437052/diff/1/lily/include/lily-guile.hh
File lily/include/lily-guile.hh (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5437052/diff/1/lily
Reviewers: ,
Message:
hi all,
if I extend the staff by a line, pitched rests appear shifted by half a
line (thus half rests look like whole rests and vice versa).
this patch is a quick fix for that.
I feel the line-positions and line-count properties of Staff are badly
tangled; I intend to work
Graham Percival writes:
> As a result, I have nothing keeping me in Glasgow, and after £160 in
> extra charges at british airways, I'm flying back to Vancouver in
> about 14 hours.
>
> You can expect a drastic turn-around in our development process by
> next week. Don't worry about updating the
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:47:12PM +, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Am I right in
> guessing that the Patch-push label indicates that the review process
> is complete and that the patch should be pushed by the developer /
> patch helper / frog-meister as appropriate? In which case I should
> push to th
On 11-11-23 06:47 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry - it only recently dawned on me that I'm probably responsible
for pushing my patches which I think have now already been reviewed
and approved.
I've read the CG and tried to understand the exact process, but as
previously noted on this list
Hi all,
Sorry - it only recently dawned on me that I'm probably responsible
for pushing my patches which I think have now already been reviewed
and approved.
I've read the CG and tried to understand the exact process, but as
previously noted on this list, the CG is not entirely complete and
up-to
On Nov 23, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:16:12 -0800, Keith OHara wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:57:22 -0800, wrote:
>>
>>> I think that you're right for most cases, but for a piece with lots of
>>> accidentals that could potentially hang over barlines, this
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:16:12 -0800, Keith OHara wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:57:22 -0800, wrote:
I think that you're right for most cases, but for a piece with lots of
accidentals that could potentially hang over barlines, this complexity
in estimation seems to help.
Have an example where
