Re: Fixes NoteColumn vs SpanBar collisions. (issue 5323062)

2011-11-20 Thread mike
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:06:53 +, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: Looks okay to me. The ghost of the SpanBar (left over from the issue 910 patch) sometimes has an effect \new GrandStaff << \new Staff { e'1 | eses'''4 r2. | e'1 } \new Staff { e'1 | e'1 | eses4 r2. } >> Something like \

Re: Adds some info about pure properties to the CG. (issue 5364048)

2011-11-20 Thread joeneeman
On 2011/11/21 07:44:36, mike_apollinemike.com wrote: I'm going to leave it this way if that's all right with you for the purely selfish reason that I grasp these lists better in terms of what they contain. That's definitely ok with me. Thanks for taking the time to document this! http://co

Re: Adds some info about pure properties to the CG. (issue 5364048)

2011-11-20 Thread mike
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:19:03 -0800, Joe Neeman wrote: Bah, I just wrote out a nice reply on the codereview site and it got eaten... On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:03 AM, m...@apollinemike.com [3] wrote: On Nov 16, 2011, at 2:19 AM, joenee...@gmail.com [1] wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.co

Re: Fixes NoteColumn vs SpanBar collisions. (issue 5323062)

2011-11-20 Thread k-ohara5a5a
Looks okay to me. The ghost of the SpanBar (left over from the issue 910 patch) sometimes has an effect \new GrandStaff << \new Staff { e'1 | eses'''4 r2. | e'1 } \new Staff { e'1 | e'1 | eses4 r2. } >> Something like \override Score.SpanBar #'extra-spacing-height = #'(+inf.0 . -

PATCH:" Countdown to 20111121

2011-11-20 Thread Colin Campbell
For 20:00 MST Tuesday November 21 Issue 1791 : footnote numbering is 'out of order' when using multiple staves in a system - R 4877041 Issue 2000

Re: Adds some info about pure properties to the CG. (issue 5364048)

2011-11-20 Thread Joe Neeman
Bah, I just wrote out a nice reply on the codereview site and it got eaten... On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:03 AM, m...@apollinemike.com < m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > On Nov 16, 2011, at 2:19 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/diff/4001/Documentation/con

parser.yy: allow negative numbers as function arguments while keeping postevents operative (issue 5418054)

2011-11-20 Thread pkx166h
passes make and make check http://codereview.appspot.com/5418054/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Make merge rests on positioning work

2011-11-20 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 20 November 2011 17:40, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi Xavier, > > […] > > I had no problems compiling the LSR-Snippet with "2.14.2" and "2.15.13". Of > course this snippet doesn't define merging MultiMeasureRests. > > […] > > Also, I didn't notice any problem with the code given by Wilbert when us

Re: Fixes NoteColumn vs SpanBar collisions. (issue 5323062)

2011-11-20 Thread pkx166h
Passes make and reg tests are here http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2000#c32 James http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Make merge rests on positioning work

2011-11-20 Thread Xavier Scheuer
Hi, Someone on the French users mailing list basically wants the features of \override RestCollision #'positioning-done = #merge-rests-on-positioning Issue #1228 is tagged as "Patch-abandoned", LSR #336 is not working with current version. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1228

Re: Duplicate index entries in NR

2011-11-20 Thread James
Hello On Sunday, 20 November 2011, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> >> If you look at accent, the two entries there are shown against a single index entry, with 2 pages in the list of references. I believe that's how the acciaccatura should appear as well - otherwise there's a tendency to miss the fact

Re: Duplicate index entries in NR

2011-11-20 Thread Trevor Daniels
Phil Holmes wrote November 19, 2011 2:34 PM From: "Trevor Daniels" Phil, you wrote Saturday, November 19, 2011 11:44 AM While looking for information in the NR I came across a duplicate index entry. A bit of copy-and-paste and text manipulation and I find that there are 65 - I've got the

Errors while compiling \markup \auto-footnote example from NR Appendix A9.6

2011-11-20 Thread James
Mike, The NR gives an example of using the \auto-footnote mark up of --snip-- \markup { \auto-footnote a b \override #'(padding . 0.2) \auto-footnote c d } --snip-- However, regardless if I use 2.15.x* this example works until I remove the second \auto-footnote line i.e. \markup { \auto-