> It seems as if LilyPond is erroneously using glyph names with a
> spaces in it (when using the sans font on windows 7 sp1).
>
> Before I try removing spaces from glyph names; I presume that these
> names come from freetype (either that or lily does something really
> stupid), does this ring a be
gmail.com> writes:
>
> The regtest comparison shows some warnings in rest-polyphonic2.ly in a
> different place. I don't know if that's significant.
It is not.
This is the regtest that proves "too-many colliding" rests will be placed
consistently, even though the array holding the "too-many"
re: bug http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1562
Hi Werner,
It seems as if LilyPond is erroneously using glyph names with a
spaces in it (when using the sans font on windows 7 sp1).
Before I try removing spaces from glyph names; I presume that these
names come from freetype (eith
Could we get that example as a regtest?
The regtest comparison shows some warnings in rest-polyphonic2.ly in a
different place. I don't know if that's significant. Nothing else
changed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4564042/
___
lilypond-devel maili
Monday 21:00.
Spacing staves with dynamics between; issue 1668
http://codereview.appspot.com/4536088/
Emit not-quite-cross-staff beams in the right context.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4564041
Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest
http://codereview.appspot.com/453606
looks fine, passes regtests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4534059/diff/9001/input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
File input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4534059/diff/9001/input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly#newcode2
input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
I did an extra regtest comparison, and it's fine. Please push
whenever's convenient.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4520050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I would love to test, but don't know enough of the internals to see what
this does.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4564041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/05/28 07:00:55, joeneeman wrote:
I'd prefer to leave this comment in
Oops; comments from your last patch are back in.
Re-reading our comments, it is clear that we always want to include
minimum-distances between adjacent lines when computing
get_minimum_translations. Adjusted patch is
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
Well, figure out how to do it with lilypond by itself, then figure
out how to do it with lilypond-book, then figure out how to do it
inside the build system.
My point was that it might be easier to do with with -book, since it's the
effect
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:48:39PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> So the command line would need to be something like
> lilypond filename.ly > filename.log?
Something like that, probably. Dunno. What happens when you try
that command on the command-line?
Remember the first rule of build systems
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Carl Sorensen" ;
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: make doc
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>Why not redirect the c
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> >Why not redirect the compile-output from each .ly to the
> >appropriate .log file? I mean, we *already* have a .log for each
> >.ly file... what's in the .log file at the momen
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
I disagree; those logs can be useful. We just don't need to see
them on the console.
Why not redirect the compile-output from each .ly to the
appropriate .log file? I mean, we *already* have a .log for each
.ly file... what's in the .log fi
On 5/28/11 9:05 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:47:11PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> - Original Message - From: "Carl Sorensen"
>> To: "Phil Holmes" ;
>> "Graham Percival"
OK - one of the first things I see is that lilypond is always
invoked > with
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:47:11PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Carl Sorensen"
> To: "Phil Holmes" ;
> "Graham Percival"
> >> OK - one of the first things I see is that lilypond is always
> >>invoked > with
> >> the --verbose flag - so each time we call lilypond
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Sorensen"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Graham Percival"
> OK - one of the first things I see is that lilypond is always invoked
> with
> the --verbose flag - so each time we call lilypond (and it's quite a
> bit -
> over 180 as an estimate from grep) we get 10
On 5/28/11 8:24 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Graham Percival"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:40 PM
> Subject: Re: make doc
>
>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> Is the aim with make docs to try to
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: make doc
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are
errors, like we have done wi
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Sorensen"
On 5/28/11 4:03 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> > From: "Carl Sorensen"
> On 5/27/11 11:40 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unles
On 5/28/11 4:03 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Carl Sorensen"
> To: "Graham Percival" ; "Phil Holmes"
>
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 2:35 AM
> Subject: Re: make doc
>
>
> On 5/27/11 11:40 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at
Do we need to change the definition of stem-attachment in
scm/define-grobs.scm to be ,boolean-or-number-pair? (and maybe define a
new ,boolean-or-number-pair predicate)?
Do we need to make any changes to ly/note-head-scheme.cc?
Do we need to check for #f in ly/note-collision.cc?
I just did a gi
Have you run a regtest comparison? I was doing a routine on this (and
your other patch at the same time), and paper-margins-consistency.ly
just borked.
I'm now also missing my GNUmakefile.in, which is *extremely* suspicious
because there's no way that running "make check" should delete that
file
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 07:53:34PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> The merge conflicts exist probably mostly because we have snippets listed at
> both 2.13.6x and 2.15.0. I guess once a snippet is backported to 2.13.6x,
> it should have the 2.13.6x in both stable/2.14 and master.
Huh, I hadn't t
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:22:01AM +, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
> Description:
> Allows line spanners to span multiple lines.
>
> Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4564042/
Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1673
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:23:19AM +, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
> Just touching base to see if people felt this patch is pushable after
> the changes suggested by Carl.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4547058/
I've added it here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1672
so tha
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:jann...@gnu.org]
)Sent: 27 May 2011 18:22
)To: James Lowe
)Cc: -Eluze; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7]
)
)
)I have no idea. We need a system that reproduces the error to play with.
)Up till now, the
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Sorensen"
To: "Graham Percival" ; "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: make doc
On 5/27/11 11:40 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Is the aim with make docs to
Just touching base to see if people felt this patch is pushable after
the changes suggested by Carl.
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4547058/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypo
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hey all,
A colleague of mine is working on a piece where he needs glissandi to
span multiple lines. I made this change and it seems to work. Lemme
know if you think it may break something else. I'll run regtests today
or tomorrow.
To test this patch, do:
\relative c''
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 5/27/11 7:53 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>> On 5/27/11 6:16 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, at the moment this produces a bunch of merge conflicts.
>>> Probably nothing serious, but it's an annoyance. Since it's been so
>>> long since the last release
lgtm
http://codereview.appspot.com/4536088/diff/15003/lily/page-layout-problem.cc
File lily/page-layout-problem.cc (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4536088/diff/15003/lily/page-layout-problem.cc#oldcode543
lily/page-layout-problem.cc:543: // using a scheme similar to the one in
set_column_
32 matches
Mail list logo
