On 2010-10-05 21:53, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
Of the three, bottom-system-spacing is slightly more
complicated, since it currently controls the spacing below
systems *and* markups, when either is the last on a page.
So the natural attachment point for syst
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
> attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
> align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
> item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
> attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
> align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
> item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
> staff, a
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> I'm getting cyclic dependency problems with laissez vibrer ties
> attached to cross-staff notes which seems harmless in a minimal
> snippet, but more serious in a real music example. It appears to have
> been introduced following the fix for
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
staff, and for markups this is the highest point of the
markup.
Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:18 AM
In the existing @knownissues for cadenzaOn, I suggest adding one
sentence (in context below) encouraging manual beams. Users might
*think* autobeaming works through cadenzas, and it does for a
while, but it will not through longer cadenz
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Does this patch look ok?
Were I daring enough, I'd say LGTM :-)
(But you do want other people to comment on that.)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http:/
