Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:18 AM
In the existing @knownissues for cadenzaOn, I suggest adding one
sentence (in context below) encouraging manual beams. Users might
*think* autobeaming works through cadenzas, and it does for a
while, but it will not through longer cadenzas.
Thanks, Keith. I made this change pretty much as you suggested.
[Graham: I believe it is right to include issues marked as
enhancements in
the known issues list, especially those with low priority. If these
are ever
implemented the docs will need to be changed anyway, unlike bug
fixes,
so the known issue list can then be amended.]
The immediately-following example depended on autobeaming, I
made its beam manual. (While I'm at it, I suggest this one be an
@example, because in this case the _code_ is the point, and the
image gives no useful information.)
Agreed
Two earlier examples use autobeaming in their cadenzas, so I
marked the two affected lines below, but this detail is not worth
much effort.
I fixed them anyway as you suggested
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
