On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
>> under Vista on my system:
>>
>> Running lilypond-book
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "c:/program files/lilyp
hello
On 8/15/2010 12:10 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
under Vista on my system:
Running lilypond-book
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:/program files/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py", line 86, in ?
import book_base as BookBase
File
OK, I fixed all these things, but I did have a question about why the
grob property didn't need to be defined.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5#newcode414
scm/define-grob-pr
On 8/14/10 5:10 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
> under Vista on my system:
>
> Running lilypond-book
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "c:/program files/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py", line
> 86, in ?
> import book_base
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
> under Vista on my system:
>
> Running lilypond-book
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "c:/program files/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py", line 86, in ?
> import book_base
The mingw binary of 2.13.30 gives the following error
under Vista on my system:
Running lilypond-book
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:/program files/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book.py", line
86, in ?
import book_base as BookBase
File "out/book_base.py", line 4, in ?
File "out/bo
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5#newcode414
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:414: (graphical ,boolean? "Display in
graphical, rather than textual, form.")
don't need this
http://codereview.ap
Reviewers: MikeSol,
Message:
Here's a patch that changes the syntax for woodwind-diagram markups so
that size, thickness, and graphic become part of the properties, rather
than part of the arguments to the markup call.
It's your code, Mike, so I don't want to push it without your
permission, but
On 13 August 2010 23:31, Neil Puttock wrote:
> I'll see if it works tomorrow, otherwise I'll copy them here.
Still no joy. It looks like the base file for the regtest didn't get
uploaded properly (according to this bug report:
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/issues/detail?id=159).
Could you
I've not been able to access the LSR since Friday. Is it down?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 8/14/10 1:55 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:50:56AM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote:
>>> How's this as a simple example?
>>
>> That should be enough for a doc person to work with. I've updated
>> http://code.goo
On 8/14/10 1:55 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:50:56AM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> How's this as a simple example?
>
> That should be enough for a doc person to work with. I've updated
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1215
> with that informat
On 8/13/10 9:50 PM, "Mike Solomon" wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> How's this as a simple example?
>
> I will likely be pressed for time over the next week as I start a new job (a
> teaching job in which one of the units will be on using Lilypond!). So,
> while I won't really be able to take the lead on
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:50:56AM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote:
> How's this as a simple example?
That should be enough for a doc person to work with. I've updated
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1215
with that information.
Cheers,
- Graham
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
