On 7/15/10 9:24 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
> I think that David's idea has some promise now. Create a new branch, with a
> version that's unique to this branch. Do all the changes in files to the
> new version. Get the patch reviewed (and get the reviewers to ignore the
> custom version).
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/2
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/2#newcode125
lily/axis-group-interface.cc:125: pure_height_cache =
scm_c_make_hash_table (1000);
This default size appears to be too big (at least for my poor co
On 7/15/10 12:54 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:15:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I think that David's idea has some promise now. Create a new branch, wit
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Currently, if I say
>
> info lilypond
>
> I'm forwarded to `lilypond-usage'.
About a year ago, somebody yelled at me for changing
"info lilypond" to be the Manuals node of lilypond-web. I didn't
know (and didn't) care enough
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:15:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >>
> >> I think that David's idea has some promise now. Create a new branch, with
> >> a
> >> version that's unique to this branch.
>
Currently, if I say
info lilypond
I'm forwarded to `lilypond-usage'. If I say
info LilyPond
I'm forwarded to `lilypond-notation'. Is this really intentional?
IMHO it's silly to get different targets depending on whether to use
uppercase and/or lowercase letters.
If possible, I would lik
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I think that David's idea has some promise now. Create a new branch, with a
>> version that's unique to this branch.
>
> \version "9.999.9" ?
How is that unique to a particular branch?
--
David Ka
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I think that David's idea has some promise now. Create a new branch, with a
> version that's unique to this branch.
\version "9.999.9" ?
> When the patch is reviewed, and everything is ready to push, do some sort of
> git grep
On 7/15/10 8:41 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:45:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
> For the record, I'd call the shell script 15 minutes (Carl already
> posted the commands, but I suspect it can be done in a "cleaner"
> manner with reba
On 7/15/10 6:45 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:56:25PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>>
The version number of a build from the current git will be higher than
the last release version. This particular
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:45:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > I think that writing a 5-10 line shell script for easily updating
> > version numbers in a patch/commit would be much less work than
> > checking all the above, though.
>
> The idea was to create a sch
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:56:25PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>> > The version number of a build from the current git will be higher than
>> > the last release version. This particular patch uses changes in .cc
>> > code, so it needs to be
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:56:25PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
> > The version number of a build from the current git will be higher than
> > the last release version. This particular patch uses changes in .cc
> > code, so it needs to be rebuilt, and hence will always b
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:04:30AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> While checking the recent changes I made to the Learning
> Manual I noticed the following fault in rendering texinfo
> to html. I don't remember it being mentioned before,
I've mentioned it, but I could never remember whether the p
While checking the recent changes I made to the Learning
Manual I noticed the following fault in rendering texinfo
to html. I don't remember it being mentioned before, and
I can't see a reference to it in the Contributors Guide.
When a cross-reference in a .itely file is split across
two lines,
15 matches
Mail list logo
