On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Currently, if I say > > info lilypond > > I'm forwarded to `lilypond-usage'.
About a year ago, somebody yelled at me for changing "info lilypond" to be the Manuals node of lilypond-web. I didn't know (and didn't) care enough about info to really argue against him, so I changed it back to this. > If I say > > info LilyPond > > I'm forwarded to `lilypond-notation'. Is this really intentional? No, totally unintentional. > If possible, I would like to say > > info lilypond > > and get to a menu which essentially is the same as the entries we > currently add to the `dir' file. I have no opinion on whether "info lilypond" should give you a choice of manuals, or the command-line info directly. I see strong reasons for both sides of this debate. > Additionally, the `lilypond-snippets' target appears in the top `dir' > file, but this target doesn't exist for pure info files. What's the > reason to exclude `lilypond-snippets'? No reason other than "nobody added it to the build system". Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
