Re: [wishlist] enhancing text spanners

2010-05-24 Thread Stemby
Hi, Stemby gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > could you provide an option to syllabify the words like in this example? > > http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/214/textspanner.png > How much would be the expected price of this feature? If it isn't too much expensive (I'm a student...) I'd like to spo

Re: page-based header functions

2010-05-24 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:37:36PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > \footer { > \if-page #'first { FIRST PAGE FOOTER } > } > > Questions: > 1. Can this be done entirely in Scheme? [Intuition: YES.] Check out the definition of \on-the-fly and things like #last-page and #part-first-page. IIRC th

Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"

2010-05-24 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:23:07AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote: > >>> @node Setting @code{X-offset} and @code{Y-offset} ... > >> > >> !!! wow, I didn't think this was allowed. > > > > I can't remember the details, but I wrote this section in > > Sep

page-based header functions

2010-05-24 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all! I want to [finally] get my Scheme-fu up to snuff, and I'm thinking of doing that by developing the following wish-list item: I would like to be able to write my headers/footers like this [warning: pseudocode]: \footer { \if-page #'first { FIRST PAGE FOOTER } \if-page #'odd { ODD PAG

Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"

2010-05-24 Thread Mark Polesky
Trevor Daniels wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: >>> @node Setting @code{X-offset} and @code{Y-offset} ... >> >> !!! wow, I didn't think this was allowed. > > I can't remember the details, but I wrote this section in > Sept 2008 and I think I just tried it and found it worked. > Was this around the

Re: Doc: NR: Reformat ly code. (issue1242044)

2010-05-24 Thread markpolesky
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Message: Patch set 3 uploaded Would anyone else like to review this patch? Thanks - Mark http://codereview.appspot.com/1242044/diff/2001/3010 File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1242044/diff/2001/3010#newcode2724 Docume

Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"

2010-05-24 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Monday, May 24, 2010 12:00 AM On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 09:54:38AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: Graham Percival wrote: > It must be exactly the same as the @node name, which > cannot have things like @code in it. Yes and no. It must have exactly the same as the @node name,