Thanks, Mark. LGTM.
Carl
On 2/27/10 3:27 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> ...and hopefully the final draft.
>
> http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi
> http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi.html
>
> Please review and let me know if there are any objections.
>
lgtm
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Polesky"
To: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 10:27 PM
Subject: CG chapter 3, second draft
...and hopefully the final draft.
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobot
Am Samstag, 27. Februar 2010 19:18:33 schrieb Francisco Vila:
> 2010/2/27 Mark Polesky :
> > 1) `make' starts with the first target if none is specified.
> > 2) the first target (in GNUmakefile) is `local-dist'.
>
> not really. make/stepmake.make is included first. But you're right in
> that 'all'
...and hopefully the final draft.
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi.html
Please review and let me know if there are any objections.
This will essentially be a one-to-one replacement of
Documentation/included/compile.ite
2010/2/27 Mark Polesky :
> continued from this thread:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00461.html
>
> Pardon my ignorance here, but these statements seem
> contradict each other.
>
> 1) `make' starts with the first target if none is specified.
> 2) the first target (in
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:42:09AM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > I get Comments on the same HTML page as Syntax Survey, and
> > all the others on an additional HTML page. Change all the
> > @unnumberedsubsubsec into @unnumberedsubsubsec, and you've
> > got a deal.
>
> "c
continued from this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00461.html
Pardon my ignorance here, but these statements seem
contradict each other.
1) `make' starts with the first target if none is specified.
2) the first target (in GNUmakefile) is `local-dist'.
3) `make
Graham Percival wrote:
> I get Comments on the same HTML page as Syntax Survey, and
> all the others on an additional HTML page. Change all the
> @unnumberedsubsubsec into @unnumberedsubsubsec, and you've
> got a deal.
>
> (I _think_ that'll fix it -- double-check locally, then if
> it works, go a
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> @allowcodebreaks false
>
> I've attached a patch that does this. Okay to push?
LGTM
> Also, I've reorganized the Texinfo usage policy and made a
> number of additions to it. I've also attached a patch with
> those changes. Okay to push?
On Friday 26 February 2010 21:45:58 you wrote:
> On 25 February 2010 17:50, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> > It must be a very simple, stupid error in my code, but I'm simply unable
> > to locate it. Here is my current patch (relativ to origin/master):
> >http://codereview.appspot.com/224052
>
Le 27 févr. 2010 à 11:07, Marc Hohl a écrit :
>
> the 'q' functionality has changed after 2.13.11 was released. Nicolas Sceaux
> pushed a patch
> to remove multiple fingerings etc., but the string information should be
> copied, IMHO.
Precisely for the reason fingerings shall not be repeated (i
Patrick Schmidt schrieb:
Hi Marc,
Hello,
I am currently engraving a piece and wanted to use the 'q' chord
repetition for the first
time. I have standard notation and tablature combined and since all
articulation information
is removed from the content of 'q', the string information has also
Hello,
I am currently engraving a piece and wanted to use the 'q' chord
repetition for the first
time. I have standard notation and tablature combined and since all
articulation information
is removed from the content of 'q', the string information has also
gone, so the tablature
is wrong. Is
13 matches
Mail list logo
