Mark Polesky wrote:
> > What does this mean?
> >
> > ly/music-functions-init.ly
> >
> > 476 %% Todo:
> > 477 %% doing
> > 478 %% define-music-function in a .scm causes crash.
>
> Nevermind. I'm an idiot. I get it.
Actually, strike that. What does this comment mean?
The 2 files below work just
Mark Polesky wrote:
> What does this mean?
>
> ly/music-functions-init.ly
>
> 476 %% Todo:
> 477 %% doing
> 478 %% define-music-function in a .scm causes crash.
Nevermind. I'm an idiot. I get it.
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lil
What does this mean?
ly/music-functions-init.ly
476 %% Todo:
477 %% doing
478 %% define-music-function in a .scm causes crash.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'm tentatively declaring the web-gop/ branch to be dead; I think
all the changes have made it into master. However, there's a few
remaining problems. #1 and #2 are important, and stop us from
having another website draft.
Could somebody investigate? These problems show up with texi2html
1.82 a
Neil Puttock wrote:
> You can also use quoted strings,
>
> "music-expression" = \relative e' { e8 f g g e2 }
>
> but they can't be used in music blocks since the lexer will only
> recognize letters:
>
> 143 NOTECOMMAND \\{A}+
>
> The lexer allows hyphens (and underscores) in markup command
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. August 2009 22:06:46 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Reinhold,
>
> > Grr, it doesn't work so well, though: This will not work in the
> > first measure
> > of a line or immediately after a time signature change!
>
> Something like this wou
2009/8/17 :
> I can see them on the "unified diff" page:
Ah, I noticed this when I previewed the changes in git gui, but
thought nothing of it since the indentation looked OK when I was
working on the file.
Looks like emacs has lost the default setting for soft tabs somehow; I
certainly don't r
On 2009-08-18, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. August 2009 23:49:28 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> > Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 17, 2009 10:35 PM
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer
> > > wrote:
> > >> The 2.13.3 results are at:
> > >>
> > >> http://li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. August 2009 23:49:28 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 17, 2009 10:35 PM
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer
> > wrote:
> >> The 2.13.3 results are at:
> >>
> >> http://lilypond.o
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Yes. All it takes is bookmarking the site, checking it whenever
>> there's a release, and reporting any broken examples. However,
>> nobody is willing to commit to do this. 15 minutes whenever
>> there's a release, which happens at mos
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
>> Graham was referring to the fact that nobody seem to bother about looking at
>> those automatically-created regression results before or after a release.
>
> Yes. All it takes is bookmarking the site, checking it whenever
> there's a rele
2009/8/17 :
> Neil, I think Jan recently fixed this issue in commit 72f03ab0b.
>
> Can you verify?
Yep, works fine here and is a better fix. :)
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
On 2008/10/09 21:25:50, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2008/10/08 03:37:15, hanwenn wrote:
> LGTM, but I don't understand what this has to do with the error
messages you
> mention.
Apologies, it is a bit vague.
Using -ddelete-intermediate-files with -dbackend=eps generates an
error:
In proce
2009/8/17 Graham Percival :
> I think that's normal for a .0 release.
I assumed the same, but 2.12.0 has results against 2.11.66 (OK, that
didn't officially exist since I made a mistake doing a version bump
before 2.12) and 2.11.65.
> Oh, yet another problem with the lack of release steps. It'l
On 2009/08/17 21:40:16, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2009/08/17 02:57:15, hanwenn wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/107046/diff/1/3
> File lily/staff-symbol-referencer-scheme.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/107046/diff/1/3#newcode45
> Line 45: " with @var{grob}.")
> fix indents
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:55:37PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/8/17 Graham Percival :
>
> > Yes. All it takes is bookmarking the site, checking it whenever
> > there's a release, and reporting any broken examples. However,
> > nobody is willing to commit to do this. 15 minutes whenever
>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:42:31PM -0400, Dan Eble wrote:
>
> On 7 Aug 2009, at 03:37, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
>> Graham wrote Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:53 PM
>>
>>> Sorry, not this time. The purpose of the unstable releases is to
>>> aid the development effort; it doesn't make sense to hold Tr
2009/8/17 Graham Percival :
> Yes. All it takes is bookmarking the site, checking it whenever
> there's a release, and reporting any broken examples. However,
> nobody is willing to commit to do this. 15 minutes whenever
> there's a release, which happens at most once every two weeks.
It proba
Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 17, 2009 10:35 PM
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
Am Montag, 17. August 2009 16:08:36 schrieb Michael Käppler:
>
> > (nobody checks the regression tests for each release, for
> > example
> > -- and that's trivially don
On 7 Aug 2009, at 03:37, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham wrote Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:53 PM
Sorry, not this time. The purpose of the unstable releases is to
aid the development effort; it doesn't make sense to hold Trevor
and Mark back just because the doc build is in flux.
The MinGW b
Reviewers: hanwenn,
Message:
On 2009/08/17 02:57:15, hanwenn wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/107046/diff/1/3
File lily/staff-symbol-referencer-scheme.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/107046/diff/1/3#newcode45
Line 45: " with @var{grob}.")
fix indents
Which ones?
I've double-
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. August 2009 16:08:36 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> >
> > > (nobody checks the regression tests for each release, for example
> > > -- and that's trivially done with a web browser!)
> >
> > That reminds me of an idea I
2009/8/17 Mark Polesky :
> I might tweak it a little (remove
> "?" if it's the last character etc.)
Ha, I knew you'd say that. :)
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-deve
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:18:56PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/8/17 Graham Percival :
>
> > Alternately, we could be stricter about this -- I wouldn't mind if
> > we insisted that people use
> > \override foo #'bar = #5
> > instead of allowing the non-# form, if then we could state as a
> >
2009/8/17 Graham Percival :
> Alternately, we could be stricter about this -- I wouldn't mind if
> we insisted that people use
> \override foo #'bar = #5
> instead of allowing the non-# form, if then we could state as a
> general rule that overrides required a # after the =
That's fine for simpl
Thanks for the report! The links are fixed in the new website.
Since the new website should be going online in a few weeks, I
won't bother changing the old website.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:53:18PM +0300, Yotam Medini wrote:
> In
> http://lilypond.org/web/switch/testimonials
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 08:47:40PM +1000, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 00:59 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > Come on, you have to admit that this is terribly confusing! And as
> > far as I can tell, none of this is satisfactorily documented. I'm
> > trying to do something about it, but
> Grr, it doesn't work so well, though: This will not work in the
> first measure of a line or immediately after a time signature
> change!
What about attaching a markup text consisting of \hspace only,
together with \textLengthOn?
Werner
___
li
Hi Reinhold,
Grr, it doesn't work so well, though: This will not work in the
first measure
of a line or immediately after a time signature change!
Something like this would work anywhere, yes?
\version "2.13.3"
\paper {
line-width = 9\cm
}
makeSpace = {
\once \override Score.BarLine #'
Am Montag, 17. August 2009 21:18:56 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Am Montag, 17. August 2009 19:56:04 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> > 4. add a hidden voice with a MultiMeasureRest, and adjust the
> > #'minimum-length.
>
> Ah, thats a nice idea. I had tried a hidden voice with normal notes (like
Am Montag, 17. August 2009 19:56:04 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Reinhold,
>
> > How can I make that one measure wider, while all other measures are
> > spaced normally?
>
> Here are a couple of ideas:
> 1. \override the NoteColumn #'X-extent
It seems I can't get this to work at all.
>
Werner LEMBERG wrote Monday, August 17, 2009 6:42 PM
I've just seen this change in a recent commit:
+...@seealso
+
+Installed Files:
+...@file{lily/parser.yy}
IMHO, this is not correct: lily/parser.yy does *not* get installed
at
all! Either we introduce a special macro which points to t
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Isn't this exactly what we already have (make test-baseline to create the
Argh, how embarrassing! Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Michael
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
Folks,
I've just seen this change in a recent commit:
+...@seealso
+
+Installed Files:
+...@file{lily/parser.yy}
IMHO, this is not correct: lily/parser.yy does *not* get installed at
all! Either we introduce a special macro which points to the source
tarball, or we omit references lik
- Original Message
> From: Neil Puttock
> To: Mark Polesky
> Cc: lilypond-devel
> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 2:36:39 PM
> Subject: Re: music-function type-check options
>
> 2009/8/16 Mark Polesky :
>
> > I didn't really ask anything in the previous post. What I
> > meant to ask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. August 2009 16:08:36 schrieb Michael Käppler:
> [CC to -devel]
>
> > (nobody checks the regression tests for each release, for example
> > -- and that's trivially done with a web browser!)
>
> That reminds me of an idea I recently had: W
[CC to -devel]
(nobody checks the regression tests for each release, for example
-- and that's trivially done with a web browser!)
That reminds me of an idea I recently had: Wouldn't it be possible to
automatically generate a sort of "checksum" for each regression-test
output-file and compar
Joe Neeman wrote:
I think the concatenation happens in parser.yy:847. Rather than creating
a new paper block every time \paper is seen, we just make a clone of the
most recent \paper block and start appending stuff to it. I don't think
there's a way (in the parser, at least) to tell when we've fi
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 00:59 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > Because \[alphanum]+ is a STRING_IDENTIFIER.
>
> Not always:
>
> num = 1
> sym = #'symbol
>
> % error: syntax error, unexpected NUMBER_IDENTIFIER (\num)
> % \num
>
> % error: syntax error, unexpected SCM_IDENTIFIE
Le 17 août 09 à 09:23, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit :
Le 17 août 09 à 02:41, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit :
Hmm, to me it seems that you are effectively calling the parser to
interpret
\include "file.ly". That is a nice way around my problem, where
only the parser
seems to have a pointer to the cu
Mark
I'm top-posting as I'm not answering any of your specific questions.
If you really want to understand how data types are defined you will
need to understand how lexers and parsers work first. To help, I've
just added a few more clues to the Technical glossary. Then you
will find all th
Hi all,
just a minor nitpick: What is the reason that the indentation in
parser.yy seems to be different than in other C++ files?
I found it a little confusing to see that e.g. if-constructs in the
parser are indented this way:
if
{
foo;
}
And in "normal" files that way:
if
{
foo;
}
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Because \[alphanum]+ is a STRING_IDENTIFIER.
Not always:
num = 1
sym = #'symbol
% error: syntax error, unexpected NUMBER_IDENTIFIER (\num)
% \num
% error: syntax error, unexpected SCM_IDENTIFIER (\sym)
% \markup \sym
> Remember, these are *parser* error messages. They
Le 17 août 09 à 02:41, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit :
Hmm, to me it seems that you are effectively calling the parser to
interpret
\include "file.ly". That is a nice way around my problem, where only
the parser
seems to have a pointer to the current book (so you are invoking the
parser to
in
44 matches
Mail list logo
