In preparing information on regression testing for the Contributors' Guide,
I happened to check the downloadable regression test results at
http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/test-output/
I noticed that prior to 2.13.2 the test results were approximately 70-80 MB.
For 2.13.2 and 2.13.3, the r
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> I think it would be better to work on other things right now. :-)
>> Unless someone else jumps in and explains exactly how event classes
>> work, that is.
>>
>> I'll put it on my TODO list. The IR really needs to
On 18 Jul 2009, at 22:07, Graham Percival wrote:
That said, in some jurisdictions you can get higher damages if
you've included a "Copyright 20xx by blah".
There was an interesting example given about UK copyright law:
If somebody writes a letter to the Queen, she becomes the owner of
that
On 18 Jul 2009, at 22:07, Graham Percival wrote:
The
copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your
character set
supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal
significance to
using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
There is nowadays no le
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:30:13AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Hans Aberg wrote:
> > > The
> > > copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character set
> > > supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance to
> > > using the three-character sequence “(C)”,
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I think it would be better to work on other things right now. :-)
> Unless someone else jumps in and explains exactly how event classes
> work, that is.
>
> I'll put it on my TODO list. The IR really needs to be cleaned up wrt
> StreamEvents and related items.
Right no
On 7/17/09 10:16 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen schrieb:
>>
>> Right, so we *must* have the function mode. Do we need the setting mode as
>> well? I don't feel strongly about eliminating it, but I don't feel strongly
>> about keeping it either. I trust your judgment.
>>
> I prefe
On 7/15/09 4:19 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Okay, I figured out a way around this -- by passing an property-alist to
> the 'before-line-breaking tweak, I was able to get all the accidental
> modifications done in one tweak (see "modify-accidental" below). I've
> also i
Hans Aberg wrote:
> > The
> > copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character set
> > supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance to
> > using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
>
> There is nowadays no legal significance of
On 18 Jul 2009, at 04:21, Mark Polesky wrote:
The
copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character
set
supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance
to
using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
There is nowadays no legal
>>> Is it because I have only version 1.78 of texi2html? However this is
>>> the only version proposed by ubuntu!
>>
>> I believe so. Try download texi2html 1.82
>> http://www.nongnu.org/texi2html/
>> then do
>> ./configure
>> make
>> sudo make install
Worked fine, thanks !
Frédéric
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009, Mark Polesky said:
>
> Is this something to address?
Depends on how much value is placed on the copyrights, and the legal
validity of gnu's viewpoint (which I am not disputing, I have no
particular knowledge of copyright law). At issue is the prospect of
someone winning
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:03:04PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> I'd like to start working on the plan below real soon now
I'd also like you to start working on it real soon now. :)
Especially the creation on essay; that way, I can start doing the
doc rearrangement and tackle the content of the
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:07:28PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 16 juillet 2009 à 16:45 +0200, John Mandereau a écrit :
> > Have you realized that it will make browsing Git history
> > more difficult and require hackery in translation checking scripts to
> > follow old history of files f
Le jeudi 16 juillet 2009 à 16:45 +0200, John Mandereau a écrit :
> Have you realized that it will make browsing Git history
> more difficult and require hackery in translation checking scripts to
> follow old history of files from docs/ to Documentation? We have this
> problem for input/texidocs,
I'd like to start working on the plan below real soon now so it can be
finished by the end of August; if it isn't I might have no time to
complete this within a year.
Le samedi 11 juillet 2009 à 03:21 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> docs/
> docs/learning.tely
> docs/learning/*.itely
> docs/not
16 matches
Mail list logo
