On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:13:32PM +, Werner wrote:
> In the Notation Reference, maybe there should be added two things in
> 1.3.2 Slurs,
> first: that \slurDown, \slurUp will take affect on all following slurs,
> second: that _( will make only this slur beeing downwards and ^( upwards.
Than
On 7/10/09 8:25 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Neil Puttock wrote:
>> I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit of maintainability, I
>> think it's worth it when it looks so good.
>>
>> One thing I don't like is the (begin ...) form though, especially
>> since there's no indentation for the h
Neil Puttock wrote:
> I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit of maintainability, I
> think it's worth it when it looks so good.
>
> One thing I don't like is the (begin ...) form though, especially
> since there's no indentation for the helper functions inside.
I would've been shocked had you not
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Reinhold
Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman:
>> A quick update on the new vertical spacing: [...]
>> Anything I've missed?
>
> While the new vertical spacing looks great for full scores (one system per
> page), I have now run int
2009/7/11 Graham Percival :
> Similiar stuff has happened to me, but since it involves the build
> process, I never bothered trying to track down the problem. I
> just do a make clean, make web-clean (that's probably doc-clean
> now), and regenerate everything.
>
> You could _try_ touching rhythms
2009/7/11 Graham Percival :
> - unless we delay 2.14 by a month or two... or four or five... the
> translations won't be ready.
Let's give two weeks to update/translate new files marked with
priority 1, then let's consider the translations are ready to move to
the new website and are ready for th
On 7/10/09 5:52 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 7/10/09 5:32 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
>
2009/7/11 Graham Percival :
> What about switching to the new website, but adding a note on the
> first page to say that it hasn't been translated yet, but those
> preferring other languages can browse the old website *here link*?
I vote for this. The note should be translated, of course.
Don't f
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 7/10/09 5:32 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
>>> Percival wrote:
And by "could you produce instructions", Carl means "cou
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>> > You're fine, Patrick. Carl hasn't read AU 3.2.2, so I was making
>> > a cheeky comment. You may recall that
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > You're fine, Patrick. Carl hasn't read AU 3.2.2, so I was making
> > a cheeky comment. You may recall that a similar thing happened
> > recently with the CG. ;)
>
> A
On 7/10/09 5:32 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>>> And by "could you produce instructions", Carl means "could you
>>> patch AU 3.2.2, since evidently the instructions
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>> > And by "could you produce instructions", Carl means "could you
>> > patch AU 3.2.2, since evidently the instr
2009/7/10 Graham Percival :
> Hi Jan,
>
> If RMS hadn't tied all those lisp scripts to an editor, I'd be
> running them every day. :P Seriously, editor-specific really
> useful scripts was a *huge* mistake.
>
> (does anybody know of a lightweight
> "process-text-file-with-emacs-script foo" progr
2009/7/10 Graham Percival :
> Hi Jan,
>
> If RMS hadn't tied all those lisp scripts to an editor, I'd be
> running them every day. :P Seriously, editor-specific really
> useful scripts was a *huge* mistake.
>
> (does anybody know of a lightweight
> "process-text-file-with-emacs-script foo" progr
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:06:19PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> But in the docs, it does not. I suspect it's actually not compiling at all,
> but just being included from the database somehow. And the LilyPond output
> is from a buggy previous version that I was working on. But I don't know
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen :
> The difference is two lines of comments. The one that is showing up in the
> docs is an older version than the one that is currently in rhythms.itely.
>
> Please note that the snippet is not an included file, but is actually part
> of the text in rhythms.itely. It's as
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > And by "could you produce instructions", Carl means "could you
> > patch AU 3.2.2, since evidently the instructions there don't work
> > any more".
>
> There are only in
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:18PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> But the fonts aren't installed right for my Inkscape, so I couldn't see any
>> of the feta font stuff. Can you produce instructions for installing the
>> fonts properly fo
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:46:18PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> But the fonts aren't installed right for my Inkscape, so I couldn't see any
> of the feta font stuff. Can you produce instructions for installing the
> fonts properly for Inkscape?
And by "could you produce instructions", Carl me
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 7/10/09 3:33 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
>>>
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/show
>>>
>>> It addresses all o
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:42:09AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> 2009/7/10 Graham Percival :
> > That said, I still think that the new website would better meet
> > the needs of most users, so I propose to add a link to the draft
> > in 2-3 week. (hosted on lilypond.org/~graham/ )
>
> So, you sti
2009/7/11 Neil Puttock :
> How about using a `try' block to import conditionally?
Alternatively, a conditional block based on testing sys.hexversion,
which is already used in lilypond-book, could help.
Cheers,
John
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lily
On 7/10/09 4:58 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
> 2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen :
>> Ahh -- there is a clue here that I hadn't noticed before. The comments in
>> the code are different in the snippet from rhythms.itely and the doc
>> output.
>>
>> That means that the snippet in rhythms.itely is *not*
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert :
> 2009/7/9 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
>> On do, 2009-07-09 at 21:41 +0900, Maximilian Albert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while running the regtests I spotted a warning about the use of the
>>> deprecated md5 module in scripts/lilypond-book.py. Attached is a patch
>>> which replaces
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen :
> Ahh -- there is a clue here that I hadn't noticed before. The comments in
> the code are different in the snippet from rhythms.itely and the doc
> output.
>
> That means that the snippet in rhythms.itely is *not* the one that is being
> compiled for the docs.
What are
On 7/10/09 4:13 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> When run from the command line, the output that results is attached as
>> FromCommandLine.png.
>
> Are you running
> lilypond foo.ly
> ? That will call the lilypond from you
On 7/10/09 1:51 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
I like it a lot.
Sorry, I still don't master Google webmail key bindings well :-(
2009/7/11 John Mandereau :
> work on bits of the translation infrastructure that have been dela lot
> delayed.
I meant "that have been delayed a lot".
Best,
John
___
lilypond-devel mai
On 7/10/09 3:33 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/show
>>
>> It addresses all of the "Bugs with solutions" listed on the wiki page:
>>
>> h
2009/7/10 Graham Percival :
> Unless there's a totally unexpected deluge of help for the website
> from my recent plea on the -user list, I can't imagine it being
> ready for 2.14. And I can't recommend delaying 2.14 just for a
> new website.
There are a few technical bits too.
> That said, I s
2009/7/10 Mark Polesky :
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:58:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> When run from the command line, the output that results is attached as
> FromCommandLine.png.
Are you running
lilypond foo.ly
? That will call the lilypond from your PATH, which is probably a
GUB version. Alternatively, if you
On 7/10/09 3:58 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/09 3:43 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:37:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>> Is there a different version of LilyPond called when make doc is running? I
>>> can't figure out what the story is. Any
Hi Jan,
If RMS hadn't tied all those lisp scripts to an editor, I'd be
running them every day. :P Seriously, editor-specific really
useful scripts was a *huge* mistake.
(does anybody know of a lightweight
"process-text-file-with-emacs-script foo" program?)
Anyway, somebody with git knowledge
2009/7/10 Carl Sorensen :
> I'll take a snippet that's in the docs (not one that's included as a file),
> copy it to a .ly file, wrap it in \relative c''{}, and everything works
> fine.
>
> But when I compile the docs with make doc, the snippet doesn't work.
Can you explain in more detail how it
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:37:36PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Is there a different version of LilyPond called when make doc is running? I
> can't figure out what the story is. Any clues would be appreciated.
There's different formatting options.
- you can see (probably) the right options in
I'm trying to finish up the revisions to the autobeaming code.
I've got it working just fine when I compile from the command line.
But when snippets are included in the docs, they seem to compile different
than from the command line.
I'll take a snippet that's in the docs (not one that's include
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have posted another patch to Rietveld:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/show
>
> It addresses all of the "Bugs with solutions" listed on the wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/SVG_backend
Does anyone else ha
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:51:19PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
Lo
I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
approach? See the attached file.
Thanks.
- Mark
#(set-global-staff-size 16)
#(begin
;; some hel
On 10.07.2009, at 18:18, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2009 17:23:50 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Reinhold
Please note that if you sign your messages in
this way people using default Windows mail systems
can't read them easily, and wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2009 17:23:50 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Reinhold
>
> Please note that if you sign your messages in
> this way people using default Windows mail systems
> can't read them easily, and will most probably
> just ignore them.
Ah, sorry
Reinhold
Please note that if you sign your messages in
this way people using default Windows mail systems
can't read them easily, and will most probably
just ignore them.
They appear as shown below.
Perhaps we could install PGP, but I probably
will not bother, as only you and one other on the
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman:
> A quick update on the new vertical spacing: [...]
> Anything I've missed?
While the new vertical spacing looks great for full scores (one system per
page), I have now run into a case where the old system worked much better. In
particular, t
On ma, 2009-07-06 at 10:28 +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> On vr, 2009-07-03 at 16:48 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need this patch to compile t1utils with GUB. I also bumped the
> > package.
>
> Thanks. Will this build with glibc < 2.10?
Yes it does. Applied.
Thanks!
2009/7/10 Graham Percival :
>> I've just got the same error. It's caused by Graham's essay makefile
>> hacking.
>
> Sorry, I'll branch a dev/graham and then revert it.
OK, thanks. Now the docs compiled fine and I could check that the
result of my patch is as intended. Any further comments or ar
Unless there's a totally unexpected deluge of help for the website
from my recent plea on the -user list, I can't imagine it being
ready for 2.14. And I can't recommend delaying 2.14 just for a
new website.
That said, I still think that the new website would better meet
the needs of most users, s
48 matches
Mail list logo
