2009/7/10 Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>: > I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized > things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this > would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better > approach? See the attached file.
I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit of maintainability, I think it's worth it when it looks so good. One thing I don't like is the (begin ...) form though, especially since there's no indentation for the helper functions inside. Don't forget to include the petrucci and (neo)mensural glyphs. ;) Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
