Trevor Daniels wrote Friday, June 26, 2009 7:32 AM
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:21 AM
On 6/16/09 1:51 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
Trevor, could you add a bit to your recent LM 4.3.1 patch about
empty-stencil and point-stencil? They are suitable substitutes
for
#'sten
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:53:47PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
>
> > lilypond-2.13.0-0.test-output.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-0.mingw.exe
> > lilypond-2.13.2-0.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> > lilypond-2.13.2-0.test-output.tar.bz2
> > lilyp
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> lilypond-2.13.0-0.test-output.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-0.mingw.exe
> lilypond-2.13.2-0.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-0.test-output.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.13.2-0.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-HEAD.webdoc.tar.bz2
the build
StreamEvent is listed in define-event-classes.scm, but the
capitalization of itself and its "children" makes it look more
like it belongs in define-event-classes.scm with the other
FooEvents...
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypo
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > precisely where should I enter "lily-sort.scm" in the file
> > "lily.scm"?
>
> IIUC, it can go anywhere in the list, as long as it's before any
> files that need to use its functions when they are loaded.
Then I'll put it just before define-event-classes.scm, which is
On 6/25/09 5:18 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> With Carl's help, I've created a new file that contains procedures
> for sorting lists and alists according to a specific algorithm
> that generates more intuitively-ordered lists, which will make it
> a lot easier to locate things in the docs, for e
On 6/25/09 4:51 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Here are 2 versions of the same procedure.
> Is the second one *too* concise and cryptic?
> - Mark
I actually like the general format of the second one better.
But I'd rewrite it a bit: It's a string-compare-http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:33:33AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 00:33 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
> Nienhuys:
>
> > Unfortunately, a lot of packages are not meant to be cross-compiled,
> > so a lot of things that GUB does are hackish. I'd not worry too mu
With Carl's help, I've created a new file that contains procedures
for sorting lists and alists according to a specific algorithm
that generates more intuitively-ordered lists, which will make it
a lot easier to locate things in the docs, for example.
I've attached the file here, but I haven't mad
Could you send a patch? Instructions are in the CG.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:22:24PM +, Maximiliano wrote:
> Hello I'd like to contribute sending (I dont know where, sorry if this is not
> the place) my espanol.ly, I have added:
_
Here are 2 versions of the same procedure.
Is the second one *too* concise and cryptic?
- Mark
(define (ly:string-compare a b ci)
(let ((mismatch (first-diff-chars a b ci)))
(if mismatch
(if (car mismatch)
(if (cdr mismatch)
((if ci ly:char-cihttp://lists
Oops, just discovered that (ly:charhttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 6/25/09 1:23 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> I like this, because it makes the out-of-order stuff be only a
>> programmer's problem, and programmers can use searches to find
>> the code they're looking for.
>
> To an extent, I would say. There's obvious value t
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I have not put a question mark on ci because ? is used in SICP
> to indicate a predicate (i.e. a function returning a boolean)
> rather than a boolean value directly.
I like it. Nice subtlety. Forgot to make that change in the
previous post (butI've noted it).
- Mark
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I like this, because it makes the out-of-order stuff be only a
> programmer's problem, and programmers can use searches to find
> the code they're looking for.
To an extent, I would say. There's obvious value to well-organized
code. The more searches a programmer needs t
Hello I'd like to contribute sending (I dont know where, sorry if this is not
the place) my espanol.ly, I have added:
* tcb, cb, cs, and tcs for tree-q-flat, q-flat, q-sharp and three-q-sharp.
* x also for double-sharp
The file:
%{
Common Spanish names for notes. "b" means flat (bemol), "s" m
Mark,
I like this, because it makes the out-of-order stuff be only a programmer's
problem, and programmers can use searches to find the code they're looking
for.
A couple of other comments:
The name of the file is lily-sort.scm, but the comment in the header says
ly-sort.scm. I much prefer l
On 6/24/09 8:49 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> One thing I don't understand: why do I need to use (load ...) to
> retrieve functions that are defined with define-public in the same
> directory?
>
The loading of the scm files is actually not taken care of by just being in
the same directory.
Thanks, applied.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 02:52:55AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Sorry if this is a sensitive topic... but
> I figured we should probably remove Rune's
> e-mail address from AUTHORS.texi.
>
> Patch attached.
> - Mark
>
>
>
>
> __
Hey everyone,
Sorry if this is a sensitive topic... but
I figured we should probably remove Rune's
e-mail address from AUTHORS.texi.
Patch attached.
- Mark
0001-Remove-email-address.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
On 24 Jun 2009, at 23:13, Graham Percival wrote:
Carl is asking about the programming internals, not the end-user
input syntax.
Sure, but if the time signature is used as key, the worry is that the
user interface may already have been locked up.
Hans
_
21 matches
Mail list logo
